Say you don't have a healthcare plan without saying you don't have a healthcare plan.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 34
Jimmy Gomez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 497
Yes37%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 34
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jimmy Gomez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 34
SoupScore
Jimmy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 80 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Senate might fold, but I sure as hell won’t.
Families are getting crushed by rising costs & as these healthcare tax credits expire, it’s only going to get worse.
And now the Senate wants us to “trust” them to fix it later with a debate on a bill, maybe?
I’m a F-NO!
#TeamGomez presented a Congressional Record to Alma Family Services for 50 years of providing social services to communities across LA.
We’re grateful for their lasting impact on LA & thrilled to have partnered with them on the Girls Today, Women Tomorrow Youth Center renovation.
🚨BREAKING: A federal judge just ordered Trump to fully fund SNAP for November by tomorrow.
Because apparently the President needs a court order to force him to feed hungry families.
A federal judge in Rhode Island has said the Trump administration must fully cover food stamp benefits for tens of millions of Americans in November. https://cnn.it/47KumOX
ICE is active in the Salvadoran Corridor in LA terrorizing our community.
You DO NOT have to speak to them.
Stay safe and share this so people know their rights.
It’s Election Day, Los Angeles!
Polls are open. It’s time to make your voice heard. Make sure you get out and VOTE!
www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ma...
Of course the president who threw a Gatsby party during a shutdown is now REFUSING to feed hungry families, even after a court ordered him to.
Should we really be surprised?
You really don't know a lot these days, huh Mike...
Haven't gone far enough?? Any further and ICE will be deporting Melania...
If your net worth doesn't start with a B don't expect anything more than table scraps from Donald Trump.
Just ask the 42 million Americans who lost food assistance while he partied like Gatsby.
SNAP benefits are uncertain during the Republican shutdown, but food help is available.
Our community takes care of each other.
If the shutdown has you worried about food or SNAP/ CalFresh benefits, here are trusted local resources and food distributions across LA.
Federal judges just ruled what we’ve been saying all along: suspending SNAP during a shutdown is unlawful and cruel.
Millions of families shouldn’t have to rely on the courts to keep food on the table. The administration must release the funds now.
Two federal judges rule the Trump administration must tap into billions in emergency funds to at least partially cover food stamp benefits in November
https://cnn.it/4ok7bSI
All it takes is a Google search to realize Kristi Noem is lying through her teeth.
In 5 days, SNAP benefits run out for 42 MILLION Americans. This crisis is completely avoidable.
Right now, Trump's sitting on billions of dollars in reserve funding for exactly this purpose but choosing not to use it. He'd rather let people go hungry.
Trump said he’d fix inflation on day one. We’re now EIGHT MONTHS in and prices are higher than ever. Trump never actually cared about helping working families.
And on top of that, Trump is going to hike health care costs and take away food assistance for millions of Americans.
Over $2,000,000,000,000 in new debt from Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, all to give tax breaks to billionaires and the largest corporations.
And Republicans call themselves the "party of fiscal responsibility." What a joke.
So we’re giving Argentina $40 billion AND buying their diseased beef? When Trump says “Buy American” this is what he means.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History497 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
497 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 10 / 10