Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

My curmudgeonly thought for the day: We would not need so many "The ending of blahblahblah EXPLAINED" videos if full-length works of narrative fiction were still routinely taught in grades 5-12. If fairly straightforward plotlines are baffling this many people, something has gone seriously wrong.
To me it feels like, in terms of dialogue, he succumbs to the white-Hollywood trope of, for lack of a better term, Indigenous Peoples Kitsch--the blues and greens and reds all speak in earnest declarative statements without contractions or humor and the one really funny line goes to Jemaine Clement.
That is not to say that Cameron did something wrong with the Avatar movies or that they fail at doing what they set out to do; it's only to note that the people who are saying that there's a particular kind of cultural discussion that most franchises generate that Avatar doesn't are not wrong imo.
I sort of get the "Avatar has no cultural impact" argument, because it connects to what Cameron prioritizes in his movies. Going to that movie is like visiting a self-contained world, and people clearly love doing it, but most people couldn't tell you who "Jack Champion" is if you held them hostage.
The US version was on pay cable (and not HBO) and aired pre-social media; it never broke out beyond its small target audience or became a real subject of discussion.
Heavy snow, and my neighborhood in NYC, including the main thoroughfare of Amsterdam Avenue, is woefully unplowed. Thanks, Mamda--no, wait, I googled and apparently the mayor of New York is someone named...Eric Adams?
I think it's a great movie, but it's a period piece and a tragedy, and both of those aspects of it are filters that can make gay stories more acceptable to straight audiences.
It's partly that, sure, but it's also partly that queer people can be very, um, declarative about deciding that something is "over" and insufficiently aware that every queer person is in a different place on their own personal and pop-cultural timeline.
With HR, the answer is yes, obviously, but it also adds a condition that none of us figured out: For a show to be the kind of breakthrough we were entertaining, it'd have to be two new actors. It helps that they're both excellent, but it's crucial that we bring no baggage to watching them.
One more Heated Rivalry thought: As a journalist I have participated for literal DECADES in the "Will audiences ever accept a frankly sexual romance between two hot actors?" discussion. It has always been used as an imaginary gay benchmark: "We'll know we've won when the day comes that..." etc. >
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferNONOFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionNONOFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →