Rep. Johnathan Jackson brought receipts proving Rubio has abandoned his principles to capitulate to Trump:
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 1
Jonathan L. Jackson
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 497
Yes38%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting8%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jonathan L. Jackson
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 1
SoupScore
Jonathan L.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 5 sponsored · 194 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Deeply saddened by the passing of my colleague, Rep. Gerry Connolly @connolly.house.gov . A tireless advocate for federal workers, public transit, and good governance, his leadership and dedication inspired us all. Rest in power, Gerry. Your legacy lives on.
House Republicans scheduled a hearing at 1AM, thinking that we wouldn’t show up, so they could sneak through their crooked agenda.
I will stay up to ANY hour to protect American families.
We ride with Congresswoman LaMonica McIver.
This weekend, I had the honor of representing Congressional leadership and engaging in the largest gathering of African immigrants in the United States at Houston Africa Day to celebrate the contributions of African immigrants and discuss key issues affecting our diaspora.
Sending prayers to President Biden and his family. Wishing him strength and a swift, full recovery as he navigates this difficult time.
This week Congressman Jackson was hard at work fighting for the people of #IL01, from advocating for food security to uplifting community voices. To stay in the loop, sign up for our weekly newsletter at Jonathan.Jackson.house.gov for the full story!
This week, my colleagues and I from the Congressional Black Caucus met with Rwandan Ambassador Mathilde Mukantabana to explore ways to enhance partnerships between the United States, the Caucus, and Africa, while identifying new opportunities for collaboration.
Brown v. Board happened less than a lifetime ago, and it’s up to all of us to stand up, speak out, and work toward a quality education for every child.
Across the country, protections meant to prevent discrimination are being dismantled. QUALIFIED individuals are being fired, books are being burned, curriculums erased, and lessons about our history removed from schools, workplaces, and trainings.
71 years after Brown v. Board of Education, the fight for educational justice is far from over.
I was pleased to meet with United Airlines to discuss aviation safety and United’s expanding operations. With over 18,000 employees in Illinois, United plays a key role in supporting our great state and the 1st district.
Congressman Jonathan L. Jackson pays tribute to the Honorable Former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexis M. Herman
Big shoutout to the officers of #IL01 and across the country who show up every day to keep our communities safe. Safety is a true blessing and we thank you for all you do to protect our families and neighborhoods. #NationalPoliceWeek
Congressman Jonathan L. Jackson Condemns Racially Biased Refugee Policy Under Trump Administration
Every child deserves to have a meal on their plate. Period.
SNAP is not a handout, it’s a hand up.
Republicans want to cut $230 billion from SNAP benefits. Costs are rising, and more people are going hungry. We should be expanding basic assistance programs, not abandoning those who need them most.
268,901 people in #IL01 could lose their health care because of this heartless Republican budget.
Tomorrow, I’ll fight to protect my constituents and all Americans who rely on Medicaid from these harmful cuts!
Everyone has the right to due process, regardless of legal status. Breaking up families and deporting hard-working, law-abiding individuals is lacking compassion and unjust.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History497 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
497 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.