Reps. Gonzales and Swalwell are not fit to serve. They must resign. If they do not, I will vote to expel them.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3
Teresa Leger Fernandez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 62 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I secured $1 million for the San Juan County Fire department to purchase a new ladder fire truck to keep our communities safe.
This is how we should be using federal dollars, investing in our communities.
Today, @senatorlujan and I met with the new leadership at the Claims Office to get answers to you.
Getting this money out to New Mexicans who lost everything is a top priority, and we will not stop until they get the relief they were promised.
The next stop on my RECA on the Road Tour: San Juan Regional Cancer Center!
To see if YOU qualify for $100,000 in compensation and how to apply, go to fernandez.house.gov/RECA
Trump must be stopped. He must be removed. The Constitution gives Republicans in the Cabinet the power to remove him under the 25th Amendment.
Republicans in Congress hold the power to impeach him.
They have the power to stop this madness.
Happy Easter to all!
May this season inspire us to come together, support our communities, and continue the work of building a more just, loving and compassionate world.
The Trump administration has made everything so expensive even food banks are struggling to fill the shelves.
So if you already can’t afford food, it’s hard to get help at places like the Community Pantry in Gallup.
YOU may be eligible for $100,000. Every elegible New Mexican should know about the Radiation Exposure Compensation act. Fernandez.house.gov/RECA.
Chaco Canyon is a sacred, living landscape.
This administration is willing to destroy irreplaceable artifacts for a molecule of gas that could be found on other federal lands across the San Juan Basin.
Imagine going before the Supreme Court to attack birthright citizenship and being unable to say Native Americans are American citizens.
This was never about the Constitution. It’s about exclusion.
PS: Love the exclamation point from the Bush-appointed judge:
"The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!”
I will never vote to allow this President to build the ballroom, with its chandeliers and gold that will forever change the nature of a place that has stood as a symbol of Presidents who believe in Democracy.
Congress, which is representative of the people, is the only entity that can authorize and appropriate funds to change the White House, build new structures, or demolish existing ones. The White House is held “in trust” for you, the American people.
Remember, every other major renovation to the White House has been approved by Congress.
The Court then issued an injunction, saying, ‘No, you can't do this, and you must stop construction immediately.’ If you don’t stop, this historic place will be changed forever.
In the end, the court rules against Trump’s attempt to give himself the powers of a King, who can do what he wants with American history, American lands, and American property.
As you read the opinion, you can see the court’s frustration with the Department of Justice as it keeps changing positions - Trump’s DOJ is always shifty.
Second, the Court found that, as he did with the tariffs, the President acted ultra vires - or basically, without any authority. In fact, the law, requires Congressional approval of changes to any of our historic places in D.C., including the White House and our important monuments.
First, the Court reviewed the Constitution and the Property Clause, which gives Congress complete authority over public lands. And yes, that was a case that came out of New Mexico - we do love our public lands.
It’s important to understand what this case just did and how that might affect Trump’s other attempts to slap his name and image on our national treasures, demolish our national heritage, and build statues and monuments to himself.
Here is a quick review of the case:
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.