Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

If you’re going to haul political opponents before Congress, you’d better be willing to follow the facts wherever they lead. The American people can see the double standard. And they deserve better than a cover up.
Not a day-trading platform. Not a billion-dollar branding opportunity. If we want people to believe in democracy again, we start by proving that no one is here to cash in. Let’s get it done.
I have supported a ban on stock trading in Congress for seven years. It is one of the few issues that genuinely brings Democrats and Republicans together. Public office is a public trust.
No president should be making billions off the presidency. No member of Congress should be trading stocks on inside information. Period.
Red lines of no mass domestic surveillance and no autonomous weapons without human control are necessary and reasonable. Yet Hegseth’s response is coercion, jeopardizing both innovation and our security. When even the AI company that stands to benefit says to pump the brakes, we must listen.
Instead of building consensus on how to responsibly integrate AI into our national defense, he’s threatening an American AI company with an ultimatum: abandon its ethics rules or be cut off, labeled a supply chain risk, or even forced into compliance.
If this were anyone else, there would be hearings, subpoenas, wall-to-wall coverage. Justice cannot depend on your title, your party, or your proximity to power. When the powerful are shielded and the truth is withheld, that is not accountability. That is a coverup.
the sitting President is referenced repeatedly in the Epstein files, and his own Justice Department refuses to fully investigate or release everything.
Let me get this straight. Across the world, politicians and public figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein have resigned, been fired, stripped of titles, or forced from public life. Yet here at home,
Reposted byMike Levin
A new Washington Post report should set off alarms for everyone who cares about this country. According to the Post, Trump allies are circulating a plan to declare a “national emergency” over elections.
We've seen this movie before, and it ended with the January 6 insurrection. Lies about 2020, pressure on state officials, and attempts to weaponize the Justice Department.
This isn’t about left or right. It’s about whether voters choose their leaders, or leaders choose their voters. The right to vote is the backbone of our freedom. You don’t “emergency order” your way around it because the polls look bad.
Let’s be clear. When you can’t win the argument, you try to control the rules. When you’re losing the country, you try to control the count.
The pretext? Recycled conspiracy theories about foreign interference in 2020. The goal? Hand the White House sweeping control over how Americans vote.
A new Washington Post report should set off alarms for everyone who cares about this country. According to the Post, Trump allies are circulating a plan to declare a “national emergency” over elections.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 11Next →