The FCC has opened a public comment period regarding the license renewal of KGO-TV, which many of us know as ABC7. The Trump Administration has repeatedly threatened to refuse renewals of licenses to silence voices of dissent and objective news coverage.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes44%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 44 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We are so blessed to have ALAS here in the heart of Half Moon Bay. Everyone should come check out this beautiful mural-- the first Latino-centered cultural arts mural on the Coastside.
For 158 years, birthright citizenship has reflected a simple constitutional promise: if you're born on U.S. soil, you're an American citizen.
No president has the authority to rewrite the Constitution with the stroke of a pen.
Thanks to the African American Community Service Agency hosting and to everyone who stopped by to share your stories and concerns.
Great to chat with members of San Jose Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority at my recent office hours. I appreciated our conversation about Social Security, women's health, homeownership, and strengthening our health care workforce.
Did you know 65% of the population is eligible to donate blood, but only 3% are blood donors?
Did you know 65% of the population is eligible to donate blood, but only 3% are blood donors?
As Chair of the New Dem's Innovation & Technology Working Group, I value opportunities like these to bring innovators and policymakers together to discuss how technology can create opportunity and solve real-world problems.
I enjoyed welcoming my colleagues from the @newdemcoalition.bsky.social on to Silicon Valley for thoughtful conversations about AI, workforce development, privacy, and entrepreneurship.
The Ounce of Prevention Act cuts red tape to allow local communities to use federal funds to strengthen infrastructure, reduce risk, and prepare for their worst day before it happens.
In the last half decade, local communities have received $22 billion in federal CDBG funding to mitigate impacts of natural disasters–but only after disaster has struck.
Great conversation with students from Redwood Middle School in Saratoga last month. We discussed AI, Super PACs, and the bills I'm working on in Congress. They brought thoughtful questions that kept me on my toes–I suspect there are some future journalists–and leaders–in this group!
We need to make corruption criminal again by passing my MEME Act, the first legislation of its kind aimed squarely at curbing presidential profiteering through crypto.
The Founders worried about foreign emoluments, and nothing turbocharges grift from foreign actors like meme coins issued by elected officials. www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...
The public and developers deserve transparent, objective rules applied consistently to regulate humanity’s most consequential technology.
The Department of Commerce reversed its decision to restrict Anthropic’s frontier AI models, but we still don’t know why. The Administration’s standards, criteria, and evidentiary thresholds remain murky.
Fired up for the US Men's Soccer National Team’s primetime World Cup match in our own back yard at Levi’s Stadium: Vámanos, USA!
We've got some great examples of companies, like Nvidia, rolling up their sleeves and working with local educators to prepare students for the jobs of the future. The SKILL Act helps us scale that nationwide.
I look forward to voting yes on KOSA and continuing the work ahead needed to protect our kids.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.