I’ve created a Starter Pack of House Democrats (and committee) accounts! I’ll continue adding as more of us join.
No matter what dysfunction we may face in the coming months and years, House Democrats are here in the People’s House to fight for the people — it’s simple.
go.bsky.app/QcpzVmz
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
15 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 204 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It would be wonderful if the next AG pick doesn’t have sexual assault allegations or was in any way qualified and independent, but, it’s Trump, so no one should hold their breath that he won’t treat the DOJ as his personal law firm and grievance machine.
Combatting terrorism and ensuring proper oversight of tax benefits should be bipartisan priorities.
However, without the opportunity to debate and address well founded concerns over certain provisions upon its reconsideration in the House, I voted NO on HR 9495.
Happy Birthday, Mr. President!
President Biden has been a historic leader, and I am so proud of all we have accomplished.
When I was 19, pre-Roe, I needed an abortion.
Because of my college connections, I had a network of white feminist women who helped me get to New York for care.
I never looked back, I was never sorry, and I will never stop fighting to restore abortion rights for all.
www.elle.com/culture/care...
I am joining nearly 100 of my colleagues in calling for the immediate release of the Gaetz report from the House Ethics Committee.
Representative Gaetz’s resignation from Congress must not obstruct the Senate’s capacity to carry out its constitutional duties.
Speaker Johnson says releasing the Ethics Committee report on Matt Gaetz wouldn’t be appropriate because of “precedent.”
No. What would be unprecedented is the Speaker conducting a coverup so that a man credibly accused of sex trafficking can become Attorney General.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Republicans' plan: Tax handouts for their ultra rich donors. Kneecap working families by gutting Medicaid and food programs.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
You'd think they'd have some shame about robbing the poor to reward the rich, but it's their only plan!! They are proud!
Republicans want children to be hungry and sicker so long as they can make the wealthy even wealthier.
Believe them!
So glad to welcome Congresswoman-elect Sarah McBride to Congress!
The people of Delaware have chosen a real fighter. Looking forward to working alongside her on the issues that matter.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
We are new here!
Here's what you need to know:
🏛️Oldest committee in Congress.
✅The folks with the money that brought you stimulus checks, lower drug prices, the new green energy economy, Trump's taxes in 2022, and SO much more.
💸Fighting to give the American worker and family a fair shot
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
🚨 ABC NEWS: Lawyer says his 2 clients told House Ethics Committee that Matt Gaetz paid them for sex
Trump, and many of his cabinet picks, should he prohibited from being within 100 yards of schools, let alone 100 yards of the White House, Department of Justice or Department of Defense.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Robbing the poor to reward the wealthy is Republicans ONLY play.
They have no new ideas, no plans to help you, only to make the wealthy even wealthier.
← Newer postsPosts page 57
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.