1/ Nothing is off the table for Republicans when it comes to delivering another tax cut for billionaires.
❌ 16 million Americans will lose their health care
❌ 17 million children will be denied the full value of the Republicans' Child Tax Credit
❌ $300B will be cut from SNAP
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 1
Richard E. Neal
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes41%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard E. Neal
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 1
SoupScore
Richard E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 5 sponsored · 40 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The rich right now in America do not need a tax cut.
Republicans and I could agree on a lot more things if they agreed people making under $400,000 should get a tax relief, not those making over $400,000.
Reposted byRep. Richard Neal
Americans are asking for lower costs. Instead, Republicans are using their spending bill to:
🔴 Close hospitals.
🔴 Defund food assistance.
🔴 Strip away health insurance.
Working people need a break — not billionaires.
Ranking Member @neal.house.gov:
2/ I've challenged presidents of my own party. That's how democracy works. We need our Republican colleagues to do the same.
1/ In less than 100 days, this administration has taken an economy that was the envy of the world & is threatening to plunge us into a recession.
The Trump Tariff Tax is tanking the economy, erasing trillions of dollars in retirement savings & increasing costs for the average household by $3,800.
This weekend, I joined hundreds of my constituents in South Hadley who stood up and made their voices heard. They want this administration and Elon Musk to keep their hands off of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans' benefits, and more.
www.wwlp.com/news/local-n...
Reposted byRep. Richard Neal
Trump’s half-baked approach to tariffs only drives our allies into the arms of our adversaries.
There is no plan and no strategy, but he’s betting every American's savings on it.
Is this what "improving education outcomes" looks like?
This administration continues to disregard Congress's Article I spending power, and this time at the expense of our students.
All of this to pay for another tax cut for the wealthiest among us.
www.masslive.com/westernmass/...
I know what it means to have that check show up every month without fail.
I don't know what my family would have done if it weren't for Social Security survivor benefits.
We cannot let up in the fight to protect Social Security.
I am deeply saddened by the passing of Congressman Raúl Grijalva, a tireless advocate for working families & a champion for protecting our environment. More importantly, Raúl was a great man, one who loved his family & never forgot where he came from. My prayers are with his family & loved ones.
Reposted byRep. Richard Neal
Republicans' Plan for Social Security:
🔴 Layoff SSA staff
🔴 Leave you on hold
🔴 Tell you Social Security isn't working
🔴 Take their "savings" to fund tax handouts to billionaires
A hard-earned benefit that you have contributed to over the course of a lifetime of work is not an entitlement and it's not a Ponzi scheme.
I know that firsthand. Growing up, Social Security survivor benefits saved my family.
Growing up, I don't know what my family would have done if it weren't for Social Security survivor benefits.
Social Security is an earned benefit, one that is delivered without fail every month.
Not a dime should be cut from Social Security.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
This is what we knew all along.
Supporting programs that provide millions of Americans, including children, women, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, with health care, or a tax cut for the wealthiest.
The Republicans are choosing the latter.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...
2/ The VA is central to the obligation we have to our nation's veterans, and this administration is turning their backs on them.
Read more ⤵️
www.nbcnews.com/politics/dog...
1/ This is the sign hanging on the door of the Springfield Vet Center after the VA cut thousands of employees in February.
Now, the administration is cutting an additional 80,000 workers and threatening to terminate contracts with critical entities like the National Center for PTSD.
After years of hard work and a lifetime of contributions, our seniors shouldn't have to worry about Republicans meddling with their Social Security.
This is an attack on our nation's seniors - plain and simple.
NEW: In an email obtained by The Bulwark, the acting Social Security administrator made clear they're going to outsource-privatize operations. The expectation is it will be the call centers that seniors depend on.
w/ @cheetah.bsky.social
www.thebulwark.com/p/elon-is-co...
Pursuing a trade war with our allies does nothing but raise prices & put jobs at risk. The outlook for economic growth has plummeted into the negative, consumer sentiment has plunged, & small businesses & farmers fear what’s to come.
The silence from our Republican colleagues is deafening.
These cuts will affect every part of American life.
Cutting Medicaid, SNAP, and other programs that everyday Americans rely upon to justify giving billionaires tens of millions of dollars? Their response? A family of four will receive $1,700.
Shameful.
youtu.be/p6wLmYl545Q?...
2/ Rather than supporting and investing in this beloved centuries-old agency established by Congress through its constitutional authority, we are witnessing another attempt at executive overreach on the part of the President.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1399 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Con. Res. 108 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7128 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7757 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-25 | H.R. 2478 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 915 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 7401 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | S. 629 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H. Res. 1335 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H.R. 9238 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8312 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 7892 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H.R. 5408 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8428 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8466 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-06-05 | H.R. 2913 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Con. Res. 84 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 2860 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 254 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7618 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 6047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 12Next →