Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 14
Born
October 13, 1989
Age 36
Phone
(202) 225-3965
Office
250 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 14

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Voting Record — 612
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 14

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez headshot
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 14
SoupScore
Alexandria's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 124 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I reach for the ELF camo concealer as much as I reach for NARS concealer. They aren’t dupes for each other (I think the elf one is supposed to be a take on Shapetape) but it is great
It really depends on your skin texture and preferences. I’m dry/combo with neutral to warm undertones, and I like lighter-med coverage. NARS and Makeup by Mario are my faves (use v little product!) If you run a little oilier I’ve also used Rare Beauty and Estée Lauder Doublewear
Mascara is TOP for drugstore. And if you want luxe kinds they sell them in discount stores too. I know some say that’s dicey but w/e I‘ve gotten the Marc Jacobs mascara from Marshall’s when I saw it Otherwise drugstore is the way to go for mascara for sure!
If I had to buy one product only that was fancier and do everything else drugstore, it would be upgrading my complexion product first (foundation/tinted moisturizer/whatever you put on your face/etc) That’s one thing that I find actually has an impact on the quality of my skin
My contribution today is that a lot of makeup/skincare marketing tricks you into thinking you need to have fanciest versions of everything. You really don’t! So many amazing, actual MUAs on set use drugstore. That said if you do want to splurge it’s good to know what types are worth “upgrading” 1st
A lot of what happened in Twitter was the right claiming they had disproportionate suspensions & bans due to “political bias.” From the research, there’s no evidence for that. Accts were banned for breaking the rules. But the right’s “working the refs”got platforms to skew their algos to boost them
A core element of right wing harassment campaigns is politicizing parts of community culture in order to “work the refs” into making a place more dangerous. They do this to media as well. Ex: they cast not harassing people as a “leftist value” and then claim political persecution when banned for it
Both. The invite tree accountability makes people more judicious about bringing in solid people, the early suspensions of bad accounts increased trust/confidence about commitment to safety, and the smaller community feels safer too. I do get nervous for #s going up & harassment campaigns starting
Does it feel safer and more fun because of the product itself or because our community is still relatively small so we feel safer to share thoughts? (I dun have an answer)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
612 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 13Next →