PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jack Reed headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Rhode Island
Born
1949
Age 77
Phone
(202) 224-4642
Office
728 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island

Jack Reed

John Francis Reed is an American lawyer and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Rhode Island, a seat he was first elected to in 1996. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Rhode Island's 2nd congressional district from 1991 to 1997. Reed graduated from the United States Military Academy and Harvard University, serving in the U.S. Army as an active officer from 1971 to 1979. He is the dean of Rhode Island's congressional delegation since 1999 upon the death of John Chafee.

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenJackReedFacebookYouTube
Jack Reed headshot
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 23(source)
Today, we mark 42 years since the Beirut terror attack that killed 241 U.S. servicemembers, including 9 brave Marines from RI. We will never forget their heroic service & the eternal sacrifice of those who gave their last full measure in defense of others.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 22(source)
Americans will not stand by while the Trump Admin strips away their right to privacy, tramples on their civil rights, & prevents Congress from carrying out its constitutional duties.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 22(source)
My colleague @merkley.senate.gov has been delivering an epic marathon floor speech for over 20 hours to protest Pres Trump's growing authoritarianism. I joined him to discuss the importance of protecting your data from misuse & abuse by this Administration.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Rep. Jason Crow@crow.house.govOct 21(source)
$250 million for his ballroom. $40 billion for Argentina. $172 million for Kristi Noel’s two private jets. $0 to lower your health care premiums.
MeidasTouch
@meidastouch.com
Open post ↗
JUST IN: The White House has begun DEMOLISHING portions of the East Wing of the White House to build Trump’s $250 million ballroom — despite earlier claiming it wouldn’t “interfere” with the existing White House structure. (Washington Post)
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 22(source)
WIN FOR RI MARINE INTERESTS: After public pushback, U.S. Coast Guard abandons plan to remove navigational buoys. I will continue to monitor this situation going forward to keep the public informed & ensure public outreach as part of any future decision-making process.
Reed Lauds Coast Guard for Listening to Public & Suspending Buoy Removal Plan | U.S. Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island
WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), a member of the Appropriations Committee, is lauding the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) for listening to the...
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 22(source)
Most RIers can’t pay an extra $7,800 a year for the same health coverage they have now. With costs rising across the board, people are already tightening their belts. Democrats have a plan to stop these huge health care cost hikes. Sure seems like Republicans don’t care.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 21(source)
From lead pipes to lead paint, raising awareness about dangers of lead poisoning helps build stronger, healthier communities. Proud to champion efforts to boost federal funds to mitigate lead hazards, strengthen clean water infrastructure, & help parents keep kids safe.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 20(source)
Trump is betraying American farmers & taxpayers to prop up his buddy & foreign ideological ally, Argentinian President Javier Milei. Trump’s financial quagmire has no exit strategy, no endgame, & will cost BILLIONS of your tax dollars.
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar.com
Open post ↗
Q: What do you have to say to farmers who feel that the deal is benefitting Argentina more than it is them? TRUMP: Look, Argentina is fighting for its life, young lady. You don't know anything about it. You understand what that means? They are dying
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 17(source)
Proud to deliver federal funds for RI’s new State Health Laboratory. From helping to safeguard our drinking water to monitoring pollution to aiding public safety & criminal investigations through DNA testing, this facility will help make RI safer & healthier.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 15(source)
Higher health care cost increases for next year are already arriving in mailboxes. DC Republicans sure seem to want you to pay hundreds of dollars more per month and get nothing new in return. Dems have a plan to prevent unfair price hikes.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Senator Mazie K. Hirono@hirono.senate.govOct 14(source)
It doesn’t matter if you’re in a blue or a red state; health care premiums are set to skyrocket. Democrats are fighting to lower those costs, no matter where you live or who you voted for. Meanwhile, Republicans seem to only care about securing tax breaks for the top 1%.
← Newer postsPosts page 23Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138NOYES✕↔Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-26S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 103 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-03-25H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 107 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S.J. Res. 116 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-03-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-03-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-20H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-18S.J. Res. 118 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-17S. 1383 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48)
2026-03-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-03-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-03-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-12H.R. 6644 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (89-10)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (84-10)
2026-03-10H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-10—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-29)
2026-03-09—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-28)
2026-03-05H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-04S.J. Res. 104 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-04H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2026-03-02H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-33)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 18Next →