There’s still time to extend the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits and keep prices affordable – Washington Republicans need to work with us before it’s too late.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Jacky Rosen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 774
Yes36%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 59 sponsored · 210 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’ve heard from far too many Nevadans who are worried about continuing to have health care coverage because they just can’t afford the massive increase in premium costs.
Bipartisan Senate majorities voted to overturn Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Brazil last week because we shouldn’t be raising costs for families. I’ll keep fighting to repeal them once and for all.
Nevadans are already being squeezed by rising prices, and the last thing they need is to be slapped with more taxes – but that’s exactly what Trump’s tariffs amount to.
Tear gas and violent tactics have no place being near schools.
I joined @cortezmasto.senate.gov and Senator Duckworth in demanding that the Trump Admin keep immigration enforcement away from schools so students can learn without fear.
The Admin has the money to fund SNAP benefits for Nov. – and 2 federal judges ordered Trump to spend it.
Instead, he’s threatening to defy a court order to force SNAP recipients, including kids and older Americans, to go hungry. It’s unimaginably cruel. Trump needs to pay out these benefits ASAP.
Washington Republicans are doing NOTHING to lower your health care costs now that open enrollment has begun, but they’re more than happy to spend your tax money on new private jets and use government planes for personal travel.
Let’s be clear: the Administration has the money to send SNAP recipients their FULL benefits for this month, but Trump is choosing not to use it.
Nevada kids who rely on this program shouldn’t go hungry because Trump refuses to feed them.
lasvegassun.com/news/2025/no...
WATCH: Time and again Trump’s own top nuclear officials told me explosive nuclear testing wasn’t needed.
So why is the President overriding their expert opinions & looking to restart this dangerous practice?
The Trump Admin’s cruel attempt to withhold SNAP funding is illegal and I’m glad to see two federal judge have agreed. Trump must distribute food assistance funds ASAP before tomorrow's deadline to make sure no Nevadan goes hungry.
www.cnn.com/2025/10/31/p...
Democrats aren't the ones who decided to send Senators home for the weekend just as open enrollment starts and health care costs go up for families. I tried to stop Leader Thune from adjourning the Senate. Don't take my word for it:
Reposted bySenator Jacky Rosen
Senator @rosen.senate.gov (D-NV) joins Jen from her D.C. office to expose the hypocrisy of Trump and his MAGA lapdogs. Watch her full interview
https://contrarian.substack.com/p/the-maga-gop-doesnt-care-if-you-starve
A massive spike in health care costs is coming and Washington Republicans are doing nothing to stop it. This is NOT business as usual – and that’s why I tried to keep the Senate working over the weekend.
Republicans voted to go home instead.
Trump’s directive is reckless and dangerous and I’ll do anything I can to stop it.
Nevadans still remember the nuclear testing era, and it left lasting radioactive contamination across millions of acres of land.
Our nuclear stockpile is annually certified to be both safe and effective, and there’s no evidence that resuming explosive testing is necessary.
Open enrollment begins on Saturday, and health care costs are up for EVERYONE who buys their insurance through NV Health Link.
Going to the doctor or getting your medication shouldn’t break the bank – but Washington Republicans refuse to do anything to help you afford your health care next year.
House Republicans are on a taxpayer-funded vacation while Nevadans worry about whether they can afford their health insurance.
It’s past time for Republicans to get back to work, negotiate with Democrats to address the health care crisis they created, and reopen the government.
Attention Service Academy applicants: applications close this Friday at 11:59 pm PT. All materials including your resume, letter of interest, official high school transcript, and two letters of recommendation must be submitted by the deadline.
Apply here: www.rosen.senate.gov/services/aca...
Trump’s tariffs amount to a sales tax on Nevadans as they’re already being squeezed by rising prices on everyday essentials.
That's why I'm proud to have helped pass a bill in the Senate to overturn some of these cost-raising tariffs.
Trump is trying to pay himself $230 million with your tax dollars, and Washington Republicans gave him the green light.
Watch what happened on the Senate floor today:
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History774 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
774 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.