
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 11 sponsored · 115 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles is doing tremendous work helping people recover from the #PalisadesFire, including grants for people encountering unexpected fees in the rebuilding process. It was good to get an update on their progress in my district office.
I’m honored that Congresswoman Laura Friedman @friedman.house.gov is coming to my district to also participate in this important in-person event. (2/2)
Tonight in Sherman Oaks, I’ll be speaking at an in-Person #TownHall, sponsored by @eastvalleyindivisibles.com, about my work in Congress pushing back against the Trump agenda and standing up for our democratic values. (1/2)
There is no excuse for political violence.
L'shana tova tikatevu v'taihatem
Wishing all who observe Rosh Hashanah a joyous and peaceful New Year in 5786.
Thanks to @wgawest.bsky.social, The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees,
@teamsters.bsky.social, Directors Guild and all who showed up to say: censorship has no place in a democracy.
Watch my remarks from today's rally ⬇️ (2/2)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGld...
Proud to stand with @friedman.house.gov, @chu.house.gov,
@reptedlieu.bsky.social and workers across Hollywood outside the @jimmykimmellive.bsky.social studios today - defending the First Amendment against Trump's FCC and its chilling attempt to silence dissent. (1/2)
It's outrageous and un-American that #DonaldTrump and his FCC are threatening private businesses and working to censor free speech they don’t agree with. #JimmyKimmel
@jimmykimmel.com @jimmykimmellive.bsky.social
End of an era.
After 18 seasons, three Cy Young Awards, one MVP and two World Series titles, Dodgers icon Clayton Kershaw announced he will retire from Major League Baseball after this season.
Read more: www.latimes.com/sports/dodge...
Full Event Recap ⬇️
sherman.house.gov/media-center...
Grateful to the +3,000 residents who joined our Telephone #TownHall last night for another productive discussion on the many issues facing Congress.
Special thanks to Los Angeles Councilmember Traci Park and California Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin for joining!
Proud to stand next to my California colleagues today at the #Redistricting Reform Act press conference, hosted by @padilla.senate.gov & Rep. Zoe Lofgren.
We must continue to work to establish independent redistricting across the US.
See my remarks from today’s press conference ⬇️
It was a pleasure greeting members from the Jewish Federation of LA here in Washington, DC. We’ve been partnering on solutions to improve security for Jewish institutions.
We've started our Telephone #TownHall
To join, dial ➡️ 747-331-8100
Our Telephone #TownHall is starting soon at 7 PM
To join, dial ➡️ 747-331-8100
Special Guests:
✅ Los Angeles Councilmember Traci Park
✅ California Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin
Dozens of right-wing commentators claimed the man who assassinated Minnesota house speaker Melissa Hortman was a liberal. Those claims were false, as were many claims re the man who attacked Paul Pelosi.
The First Amendment protects speech from governmental retribution, even if it’s wrong. (2/2)
It is now clear that all the power of the federal government, including the FCC, is being used to silence all voices but #MAGA (1/2)
#SaveJimmyKimmel
Tonight: Join our Telephone #TownHall starting at 7 PM to voice your thoughts on the issues facing Congress
Special Guests:
✅ Los Angeles Councilmember Traci Park
✅ California Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin
RSVP/Submit a question: BradSherman.house.gov/RSVP
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.