PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Adam B. Schiff headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from California
Born
June 22, 1960
Age 66
Phone
(202) 224-3841
Office
112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California

Adam B. Schiff

Adam Bennett Schiff is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from California, a seat he has held since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, Schiff served 12 terms in the United States House of Representatives from 2001 to 2024 and was a member of the California State Senate from 1996 to 2000.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes31%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align93%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenAdamSchiffFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Adam B. Schiff headshot
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 71 sponsored · 330 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 15(source)
The Trump family is chasing another real estate deal in Saudi Arabia. And the Saudis want a mutual defense agreement and access to U.S. nuclear technology. Looks like Trump and the royal family will both win, with our national security for sale. The only losers? The American people.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 15(source)
This administration is working overtime to deny Donald Trump’s involvement with Jeffrey Epstein — but the American people aren’t buying it. It's time for a real investigation. It’s time to release the full Epstein Files, like Trump promised during his campaign.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 15(source)
If you engage in an insurrection to overturn an election on behalf of the president, you get a pardon. If you illegally possess firearms, that too will be excused. Trump’s actions are a dangerous invitation to lawlessness, if you use that lawlessness to keep him in power.
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney.bsky.social
Open post ↗
NEWS: President Trump has issued a *second* pardon for Jan. 6 defendant Dan Wilson. Wilson, a militia member, remained in prison on a firearms conviction unrelated to the Capitol attack. But Trump's new pardon explicitly covers the gun charges. www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 15(source)
Republicans in Congress passed the largest cut to health care in American history. Californians already are feeling the impacts of this attack on access to care.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 15(source)
The closure of Glenn Medical Center in the Sacramento Valley is putting the lives and wellbeing of thousands at risk. I'm working hard to pass my bipartisan legislation to help reopen Glenn Medical and protect health care access in rural communities across California.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 14(source)
Is the Trump administration trying to drag America into another war? They are parking some of our most lethal warships off the coast of Venezuela and sending thousands of service members to the region. And we're supposed to believe this is about blowing up speedboats?
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 14(source)
Donald Trump’s White House says he is now going to “refocus” on the cost of living. The issue he campaigned on and then ignored. In favor of a golden ballroom, and Great Gatsby parties. Americans deserve better.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 13(source)
Recently, I wrote an op-ed detailing how dangerous it would be to allow oil drilling along the coast of California and why it's crucial that we push back. x.com/senadamschif...
Adam Schiff on X: "Recently, I wrote an op-ed detailing how dangerous it would be to allow oil drilling along the coast of California and why it's crucial that we push back. https://t.co/H2vfHxvi2c" / X
Recently, I wrote an op-ed detailing how dangerous it would be to allow oil drilling along the coast of California and why it's crucial that we push back. https://t.co/H2vfHxvi2c
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 13(source)
President Trump’s Big Oil agenda prioritizes the profits of giant corporations at the expense of our coastlines. California has suffered greatly from oil spills in the past. We cannot let history repeat itself.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 12(source)
Donald Trump said prices were going down under his watch. That’s a lie. Even Fox has some updated stats for him. Trump needs to spend less time on the golf course and on plans for the ballroom, and more time trying to live up to his promises.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 10(source)
Last night's so-called deal was a tragically disappointing result for the millions of Americans who are facing higher health care costs next year, and for our efforts to confront this bully of a President. I voted no. Let's talk about where we go from here. youtu.be/Zc-sUG6myqE?...
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 10(source)
First, Trump pardoned the violent insurrectionists who beat cops. Now, he pardons the key instigators of January 6th. We need to see this for what it is: An attempt to erase history, so it can be repeated.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 10(source)
I refuse to support a funding bill that fails to address the Republican health care crisis. And make health insurance affordable. The American people clearly understand the stakes and the urgency. We must too. I'm voting no.
Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govNov 8(source)
Now there are TWO lists the White House won't release. First it was the Epstein Files. Now it's who's paying for Trump's Golden Ballroom. Apparently, the only promises the President keeps are those that benefit himself and his billionaire friends.
← Newer postsPosts page 34Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-02-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-34)
2026-02-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-02-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-02-24H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (49-47)
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2026-02-10S.J. Res. 95 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2026-02-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-02-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2026-02-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-46)
2026-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2026-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (58-39)
2026-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-39)
2026-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-40)
2026-02-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (67-33)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (32-67)
2026-01-29H.R. 7148 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-27S. 3627 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageNOYES✕Bill Passed (82-15)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)End debateNOYES✕Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-14S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 98NONO✓Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2026-01-13S.J. Res. 84 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-01-12H.R. 6938 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYES✕Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-40)
2026-01-08S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47)
2026-01-07S.J. Res. 86 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50)
2026-01-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2026-01-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-01-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-35)
2025-12-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-12-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2025-12-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-36)
2025-12-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-12-18S. Res. 532 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-12-18S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Defeated (50-50)
2025-12-17S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-12-17—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-29)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 18Next →