At a Glance

Seat

Representative for Nebraska District 3

Born

December 19, 1970

Age 55

Phone

(202) 225-6435

Office

502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 534

Yes76%

No22%

Present0%

Not Voting2%

Party align98%

Cross-party2%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @RepAdrianSmith Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Adrian Smith

U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3

SoupScore

Adrian's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 84 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 25(source)

This is their playbook: No warning, no transparency, no coordination. Their goal here isn’t safety, it’s to sow chaos, fear, and intimidation.

Tina Smith

@smith.senate.gov

Open post ↗

We’re still gathering information about what happened in St. Paul, but what we do know is that once again, federal authorities provided no notice to local leaders or law enforcement.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 25(source)

We’re still gathering information about what happened in St. Paul, but what we do know is that once again, federal authorities provided no notice to local leaders or law enforcement.

Reposted byTina Smith

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govNov 25(source)

He uses legal harassment as an intimidation tactic to scare people out of speaking up. This isn’t just about a video. This is not the America I know, and I’m not going to let this next step from the FBI stop me from speaking up for my country and our Constitution.

Reposted byTina Smith

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govNov 25(source)

The President directing the FBI to target us is exactly why we made this video in the first place. He believes in weaponizing the federal government against his perceived enemies and does not believe laws apply to him or his Cabinet.

Reposted byTina Smith

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govNov 25(source)

Last night, the FBI's Counterterrorism Division appeared to open an inquiry into me in response to a video President Trump did not like.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 25(source)

We’re with you, Elissa

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 22(source)

In a typical move, Donald Trump attacks our Somali community because he can’t think of anything else to do on a Friday night. That’s who he is, but it’s not who we are.

Post from Donald Trump: Minnesota, under Governor Waltz, is a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity. I am, as President of the United States, hereby
terminating, effective immediately, the Temporary Protected Status (TPS Program) for Somalis in Minnesota. Somali gangs are terrorizing the people of that great State, and BILLIONS of Dollars are missing. Send them back to where they came from. It's OVER! President DJT

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 21(source)

These threats aren’t abstract. They are real. They’ve hurt the people I love. We all need to stand against this.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 20(source)

EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN CONGRESS should be pressed about Trump calling for their colleagues to be killed

Aaron Rupar

@atrupar.com

Open post ↗

Insanity

SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!

Reposted byTina Smith

Chris Murphy@chrismurphyct.bsky.socialNov 20(source)

The President of the United States just called for Democratic members of Congress to be executed. "HANG THEM", he posted. If you're a person of influence in this country and you haven't picked a side, maybe now would be the time to pick a fucking side.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 20(source)

Trump should spend less time building a multi-million dollar ballroom and more time figuring out how to fix this.

More Perfect Union

@moreperfectunion.bsky.social

Open post ↗

U.S. grocery prices have hit a record high — the monthly cost for a family of four is now $1,030.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

We can’t let up the pressure now. Trump needs to sign the bill and we need to see the full files released. These young girls were misled and abused by powerful men who thought the rules didn’t apply to them, that they could get away with anything. It’s the least we can do for justice.

Kyle Griffin

@kylegriffin1.bsky.social

Open post ↗

BREAKING: The Senate just passed the Epstein bill by unanimous consent. The bill will automatically pass once it's delivered to the Senate and will then advance to Trump's desk for him to sign — possibly as early as this evening.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

The Senate should vote on the Epstein Files ASAP

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

If I were a betting woman, I’d put money down that Trump's going to use his “investigation” into Epstein to justify not releasing everything. He’s just trying to save his ass.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

Once the House votes, the Senate should take it up ASAP

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

Once the House votes, the Senate should take it up ASAP.

Tina Smith

@smith.senate.gov

Open post ↗

There isn’t any justification to vote to keep the Epstein files hidden. The American people deserve answers.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 18(source)

There isn’t any justification to vote to keep the Epstein files hidden. The American people deserve answers.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 17(source)

Congratulations Team Casper, and bravo Team Shuster, you’ve been incredible. Onward to the Olympics!

Link

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govNov 14(source)

Minnesota has one of the strongest, most carefully regulated systems in the country to allow the sale of hemp products like THC beverages. This ban just needlessly screws everything up while hurting our breweries.

← Newer postsPosts page 18Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(24)

H.R. 8528 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to skilled nursing facilit…
H.R. 8313 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the Trump accounts contribution…
H.R. 7922 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit to certain small employers fo…
H.R. 7666 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow payments under the Medicare program…
H.R. 6280 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for expanded coverage of services…

Cosponsored Bills(84)

H.R. 8837 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a microemployer pension plan start…
Joined: 2026-05-14
H.R. 8781 (119th)
To clarify that for purposes of Federal nondiscrimination requirements applicable to educati…
Joined: 2026-05-13
H.R. 8631 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that low alcohol by volume kombucha is …
Joined: 2026-04-30
H. Res. 1156 (119th)
Expressing support for tax policies that support working families.
Joined: 2026-04-14
H.R. 1011 (119th)
Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act of 2025
Joined: 2026-03-27

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

534 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-02-07	H.R. 26 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H.R. 776 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-04	H.R. 43 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-23	H.R. 471 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 375 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	S. 5 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 165 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 187 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-21	H.R. 186 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-15	H.R. 33 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 144 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 164 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-14	H.R. 153 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 152 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-13	H.R. 192 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-09	H.R. 23 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-07	H.R. 29 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Motion to Commit with Instructions	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	—	Election of the Speaker	NOT_VOTING	—	—	Johnson (LA)
2025-01-03	—	Call by States	PRESENT	—	—	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11