At a Glance

Seat

Representative for Nebraska District 3

Born

December 19, 1970

Age 55

Phone

(202) 225-6435

Office

502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 550

Yes76%

No22%

Present0%

Not Voting2%

Party align98%

Cross-party2%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @RepAdrianSmith Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Adrian Smith

U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3

SoupScore

Adrian's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 86 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMay 2(source)

This is an abortion ban

Kyle Griffin

@kylegriffin1.bsky.social

Open post ↗

Reuters: US APPEALS COURT TEMPORARILY BLOCKS MAIL-ORDER ACCESS TO ABORTION DRUG MIFEPRISTONE

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMay 2(source)

We should all be paying attention to what this means. Getting rid of Roe wasn’t the end game and they will go further. Anti choice extremists in state legislatures are teaming up with allies on the federal bench to take your freedom to control the course of your life.

Court restricts abortion access across the US by blocking the mailing of mifepristone

A federal appeals court has restricted access to one of the most common means of abortion in the U.S. by blocking the mailing of mifepristone.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 20(source)

Minnesota and countless other states have proven how we can safely decriminalize and regulate the cannabis industry. Long overdue for the federal government to take a page out of that playbook.

Reposted byTina Smith

Save the Boundary Waters@savetheboundarywaters.orgApr 20(source)

Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a devastating bill that will undo protections for the Boundary Waters. Listen to this feature on NPR's All Things Considered featuring Explorers Amy and Dave Freemans and @smith.senate.gov discussing what this means for the wilderness. www.npr.org/2026/04/18/n...

Newly approved mining in Minnesota may threaten waterways of a beloved nature preserve

Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota is filled with more than a thousand lakes and rivers. But a recent vote in congress to allow mining nearby could threaten the preserve's waterways.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 20(source)

A good time for a reminder that locking people up for low level marijuana offenses doesn’t solve anything and our federal laws need to catch up with the times

Pop Crave

@popcrave.com

Open post ↗

Today is 4/20.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 17(source)

The fight for the Boundary Waters isn’t over, it just looks a little different now. We will not give up. That would play right into their hands.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 17(source)

Losing hope is exactly what they want us to do. While the vote against the Boundary Waters is fresh on our minds, the work continues. Headed to Greater Minnesota now to keep up the fight. We have so much to do to tackle corporate greed in areas like housing and health care.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 16(source)

Do not lose hope.

One day, the shoe will be on the other foot, and they will regret what they did to the Boundary Waters today — because this was a mistake. They've set a new precedent that no public lands are ever truly sate, including those in Montana. Utah. The Dakotas. Idaho.
Republicans privately told me they knew this is wrong, and I wish they had voted their conscience.
Tonight, we take a much-needed rest.
Tomorrow, we figure out what comes next.
-Tina

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 16(source)

I'm about to deliver my closing remarks in opposition to a measure that would allow toxic copper-nickel sulfide mining in the watershed of the Boundary Waters. Tune in.

SENATORS DELIVER FINAL REMARKS BEFORE BOUNDARY WATERS VOTE

YouTube video by Senator Tina Smith

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 16(source)

Since they’re abusing the Congressional Review Act to get around the filibuster, I am reserving some of my time so I can make closing remarks in the morning before the final vote. Maybe they’ll listen to reason after a night’s sleep. Stay tuned. Save the Boundary Waters.

Photo of my desk with a boundary waters canoe area forest service sign next to the Minnesota state flag and a framed photo of my parents.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 16(source)

I’m holding the Senate floor tonight in protest of legislation that would allow a copper-nickel sulfide mine on the doorstep of the Boundary Waters. Not this mine. Not this place.

SENATOR HOLDS THE FLOOR TO DEFEND THE BOUNDARY WATERS

YouTube video by Senator Tina Smith

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 15(source)

70% of Minnesotans do NOT want copper nickel mining near the Boundary Waters. The Senate has a chance to do right by them by leaving the mining moratorium in place.

Reposted byTina Smith

Patagonia@patagonia.comApr 15(source)

As soon as today, the US Senate will vote on a House resolution that allows copper mining by a Chilean company near Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The Boundary Waters is the most-visited wilderness area in the country, and it cannot be replaced.

Reposted byTina Smith

Minnesota Star Tribune@startribune.comApr 15(source)

This is not a drill: The Senate is poised to blow up Boundary Waters mining protections, columnist Jill Burcum writes.

Burcum: Will the Senate betray the Boundary Waters?

This is not a drill: The Senate is poised to blow up Boundary Waters mining protections, columnist Jill Burcum writes.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 14(source)

Not this mine. Not this place. Save our Public Lands. Save the Boundary Waters.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 13(source)

The Boundary Waters don’t just belong to Minnesotans. They’re the birthright of every single American. Why would we let a foreign mining company ruin them just so they can mine OUR resources, ship them off to China and enrich their shareholders?

Map showing the pollution a proposed copper-nickel mine would have on the Boundary Waters, Voyageurs National Park and Quetico Provincial Park.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 13(source)

Not this mine. Not this place. Tell Congress: NO on HJRes 140!

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 13(source)

The threat to the Boundary Waters isn’t just about Minnesota — the legislative gymnastics being thrust upon us to allow copper-nickel mining in this watershed would mean no public lands are ever truly protected. We would be opening Pandora’s box… for what? The profits of a foreign mining company?

Photo of a canoe in the Boundary Waters. The waters are so still that the sky is reflected on the surface.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 11(source)

It’s an incredible day to watch our astronauts make history. Welcome home!

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 10(source)

← Newer postsPosts page 2Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(24)

H.R. 8528 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to skilled nursing facilit…
H.R. 8313 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the Trump accounts contribution…
H.R. 7922 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit to certain small employers fo…
H.R. 7666 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow payments under the Medicare program…
H.R. 6280 (119th)
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for expanded coverage of services…

Cosponsored Bills(86)

H.R. 8967 (119th)
To provide for an extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program.
Joined: 2026-05-21
H.R. 8872 (119th)
Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act
Joined: 2026-05-19
H.R. 8837 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a microemployer pension plan start…
Joined: 2026-05-14
H.R. 8781 (119th)
To clarify that for purposes of Federal nondiscrimination requirements applicable to educati…
Joined: 2026-05-13
H.R. 8631 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that low alcohol by volume kombucha is …
Joined: 2026-04-30

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

550 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-02-26	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-26	H.R. 804 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-26	H.R. 788 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H. Res. 161 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H. Res. 161 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H.R. 818 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H.R. 832 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-24	H.R. 825 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-13	H.R. 35 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-12	H.R. 77 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-12	H.R. 77 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-02-11	H. Res. 122 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-11	H. Res. 122 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-10	H.R. 736 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-10	H.R. 692 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-07	H.R. 26 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-07	H.R. 26 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H.R. 776 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-04	H.R. 43 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-23	H.R. 471 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 375 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	S. 5 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 165 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 187 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-21	H.R. 186 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-15	H.R. 33 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 144 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 164 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Send back to committee	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-14	H.R. 153 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 152 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-13	H.R. 192 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-09	H.R. 23 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-07	H.R. 29 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Motion to Commit with Instructions	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	End debate now	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	—	Election of the Speaker	NOT_VOTING	—	—	Johnson (LA)
2025-01-03	—	Call by States	PRESENT	—	—	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11