Polls close at 7 PM, Arizona!
If you haven't voted yet, there's still time. Find your local voting place below ⬇️
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Arizona District 4
Greg Stanton
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes47%
No50%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Stanton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratArizona District 4
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
My new report reveals FEMA staff were secretly diverted from their life-saving work to serve as the "operational backbone" of ICE.
We're in the middle of hurricane and wildfire season. This decision leaves every American less safe when disaster strikes.
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
Donald Trump has made life more expensive because he chose to plunge America into an unwanted, reckless and costly war of choice.
Businesses will be forced to pass on their costs to consumers, which means prices are going to be even HIGHER.
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
Democrats and Republicans on the T&I Committee agree that FEMA needs reform.
That’s why Congress needs to hurry up and pass the FEMA Act of 2025 to help communities before and after disaster strikes. Learn more: www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HO3...
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
House Republicans are attempting to jam through a reckless budget that:
- Spends MORE taxpayer dollars on an endless war with Iran
- Does NOTHING to lower costs for Americans
Unbelievable.
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
$477 dollars that could have spent on groceries, rent, childcare or healthcare.
Donald Trump is being reckless with Americans' budgets.
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
Trump said he'd lower prices "on day one." Instead, his reckless war with Iran has pushed gas prices back over $4 a gallon and made everyday life more expensive. American families deserve leaders who lower costs—not drive them up.
Reposted byRep. Greg Stanton
USMCA is the backbone of North American trade, supporting 13 million American jobs and nearly $2 trillion in annual commerce. That’s why New Dems are urging the Trump Administration to preserve and strengthen the agreement—not undermine it.
Here we go again. Trump's new 50% tariff on Canadian goods is another tax on American families — with no exemptions for goods covered by USMCA.
I led bipartisan bills to cancel Trump's reckless tariffs the first time, and I'll do it again if I have to.
I joined @joaquincastrotx.bsky.social and over a hundred of my colleagues to demand DHS close ICE's Dilley Immigration Processing Center and end family detention.
You can find your local polling place here ⬇️
locations.maricopa.vote
Tomorrow, July 21st, is Primary Election Day in Arizona!
If you haven’t sent in your ballot, make a plan to vote now. 🗳️
America's most sensitive negotiations are being handled by private citizens focused on cashing in on their relationships around the world.
Where’s Secretary Rubio if Trump’s friends and family are out doing his job?
The quickest way to lower costs is to end the war of choice and scale up clean energy investments, not gut them.
Utility bills are soaring because of Trump's on-again, off-again war in Iran and his decision to cancel solar, wind, battery and other clean energy projects across the country.
And coverage of it in the Washington Post here ⬇️
www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
You can find the full report here ⬇️
democrats-transportation.house.gov/imo/media/do...
My new report exposes how they gutted the agency from the inside and, in doing so, are putting Americans at risk.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.