
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 31
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 31
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 31
SoupScore
Gilbert Ray's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
And if that wasn't enough, they left their phone numbers and passwords available online, susceptible to hackers and foreign adversaries. This would be deeply embarrassing, if wasn't already a national security risk. www.spiegel.de/internationa...
Yet another example of Secretary Hegseth's and National Security Advisor Waltz's lack of judgement and disregard for national security. Every day they refuse to take accountability and resign is a disgrace. www.wired.com/story/michae...
Yet another example of Secretary Hegseth's and National Security Advisor Waltz's lack of judgement and disregard for national security. Every day they refuse to take accountability and resign is a disgrace. www.wired.com/story/michae...
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
HASC Dems are calling on Chairman Rogers to convene a hearing w/Sec Hegseth to testify about reports in The Atlantic that senior Trump officials conferred about a highly sensitive NatSec matter, including "precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing," on an open-source app.
People shouldn't be able to skirt gun safety laws when purchasing ghost gun kits. Glad the Supreme Court upheld this important Biden Administration measure that helps keep our communities safe.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
Where is the integrity? They lied. This is not type of leadership we need at the top of the government. Secretary Hegseth and Director Waltz need to resign.
I'm curious how Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and Director Waltz will attempt to spin this instead of taking accountability and answer for their OpSec breach. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Let's go @hascrepublicans get him in and show some accountability!
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
Democratic House Rep. Gil Cisneros says Pete Hegseth will eventually have to testify before the Armed Services Committee:
"If they think he's not going to get asked about this, they're not living in reality. He's gonna have to answer the call at some point, so why not do it now?"
Exactly!
Let's be clear, the "tax cuts" Trump wants to extend are tax breaks for big corporations and billionaires. The 15 largest corporate beneficiaries of the 2017 tax cuts saved a combined $97.5 billion over four years. How is that helping everyday Americans? substack.perfectunion.us/p/corporate-...
Sec. Hegseth and the Trump administration are actively jeopardizing our servicemembers and U.S. national security interests with their cavalier attitude towards operational security. There should be a full investigation.
And if those comments weren't evidence enough, Shadow President Musk and DOGE are making it crystal clear that they view Social Security as on the chopping block: www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
There are 125,156 people in the 31st district who receive Social Security. They deserve to live in dignity. Sec. Lutnick and the Trump administration are incapable of empathizing with the millions of Americans who have paid into the system and earned their benefits.
Reposted byRep. Gil Cisneros
Today marks 15 years since Affordable Care Act was signed into law!
As we celebrate the ACA, it seems like a great day to share my first post on here looking back at some moments in its history to tell the story of how it happened.
Actually, Americans voted for lower prices. Unfortunately, President Trump and Elon Musk are more focused on petty political grievances, causing chaos, and creating new tax breaks for billionaires than they are on working to create an economy that works for everyday Americans.
Trump's decision to make the SBA handle student federal loans makes no sense. And Sec. Loeffler just announced her intention to downsize the SBA by 40%. This is not only a disservice to our students, but it will negatively impact countless small businesses. www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
Not only does this raise several alarming conflicts of interest because of his SpaceX contracts, but Shadow President Musk has no security clearance and should not be involved in decisions that affect our national security, period. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/u...
Elon and Trump are actively undermining our national security. By pausing funding for violence prevention and domestic terrorism monitoring, Elon and Trump are making it harder for the DOJ and DHS to track white supremacist violence and hate crimes. www.propublica.org/article/trum...
Real federal auditors agree: Shadow President Musk has no idea what he's doing. And he has no interest in actually doing a good job, he just wants to enrich himself and run our government into the ground, just like one of his failed business ventures. www.wired.com/story/federa...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-21 | H. Con. Res. 58 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.