Christopher R. Deluzio headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Pennsylvania District 17
Born
July 13, 1984
Age 41
Phone
(202) 225-2301
Office
1222 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17

Christopher R. Deluzio

Christopher Raphael Deluzio is an American politician, attorney, and former U.S. Navy officer serving as the U.S. representative for Pennsylvania's 17th congressional district since 2023. He is a member of the Democratic Party. The district encompasses most of the northwestern suburbs and exurbs of Pittsburgh, and includes the entirety of Beaver County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 17

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Christopher R. Deluzio headshot
Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I think Congress should pass a four-week funding extension that stops harmful cuts, keeps government open, and allows Congress to reach a bipartisan funding agreement. I am ready to return to vote in Washington to pass a four-week extension.
There’s a lot going on right now in Washington, and I want to hear from you as I fight for all of us in Western PA. Join me for a Town Hall on March 13th at 6pm in Kennedy Twp. Large attendance is expected and may exceed the venue’s capacity, so registration is required to reserve your seat.
A graphic for Chris Deluzio's Town Hall. A picture of him talking to a constituent with the details for the March 13 6-7pm event at the bottom.
Western Pennsylvanians know how important it is to get this right. That’s why Democrats must fight hard for smart tariffs and other trade policies that will deliver good-paying jobs and restore America’s manufacturing leadership. More in my NY Times opinion piece: www.nytimes.com/2025/03/07/o...
Rather than reflexively condemning all tariffs, the party should highlight how Trump’s scattershot threats, unanchored to real industrial strategy, won't result in rebuilding manufacturing, raising wages, or rebalancing trade. Trump's chaotic tariff 2-step is bad biz for America.
Democrats should embrace tariffs as one part of a broader industrial strategy to revitalize 🇺🇸 manufacturing and make whole communities hollowed out by bad trade policy. This isn’t just about making the economy work for more people; it’s about earning back trust and faith.
Many of my constituents support smart tariffs, particularly ones that target China. So do I. Most Americans—especially those w/o college degrees—support tariffs in part, economists suggest, because places hurt by global competition view them as “a sign of political solidarity.”✊
If you oppose all tariffs, you’re signaling that you’re comfortable with exploited foreign workers making your stuff at the expense of American workers. I’m not and neither are most voters.
President Trump’s tariff approach has been chaotic and inconsistent. There’s no doubt about that. But the answer isn’t to condemn all tariffs. That risks putting the Democrats even further out of touch with the hard-working people who used to be the lifeblood of the party.
👋Fellow Democrats, the party needs to rethink all the anti-tariff absolutism. I’m a Rust Belt Democrat from swingy Western PA—where lousy trade deals like NAFTA stripped us for parts. Democrats need to break free from the zombie horde of neoliberal economists who think tariffs are always bad. 🧵
That's why I'm a proud co-sponsor of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act—it will level the playing field for workers, protecting the freedom to form and join a union, and taking on union busters that break the law. (2/2)
A graphic that says "Congressional Labor Caucus. Proud Cosponsor of the PRO Act" with an icon of three upheld fists, one of them holding a wrench.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
536 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 11Next →