BREAKING: I just introduced the Protect IVF Act.
No more toothless executive orders.
No more empty promises.
If Donald Trump really wants to protect IVF, he’d tell Republicans to support our bill so we can get this done.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois
Tammy Duckworth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting8%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 48 sponsored · 357 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Using active-duty Marines this way sets a dangerous precedent that damages public trust in our military.
Trump himself said LA is "simmering, but not very much.”
And yet, he's putting our troops at risk and undermining the democracy each one of them swore to defend.
Higher costs for fertilizer.
Canceled exports.
Stalled equipment upgrades.
For our farmers, Trump's tariffs are not a “boost”—it’s a disaster.
To Trump and Republicans, it's “fiscally responsible” to kick millions off Medicaid and SNAP—
In order to fund billionaire tax breaks that will add $2.4 TRILLION to the deficit.
The big, ugly bill is a total sham. It steals from everyone to give to the few.
Let's keep our transgender servicemembers and kick out Hegseth.
Proud to join @unite4vets.bsky.social to rally for our heroes!
One thing is clear: we will never back down even as Donald Trump abandons our Veterans—hooah! 🇺🇸
If you're willing to risk your life for our country and can kill our enemies with lethal precision, it shouldn't matter if you're gay, straight, transgender, white, Black or anything else.
For all Hegseth’s talk about making our military stronger and more lethal, implementing this un-American transgender military ban will do the opposite.
It shrinks our fighting force.
It undermines readiness.
It jeopardizes our national security.
www.advocate.com/news/tammy-d...
As we mark the 81st anniversary of D-Day, we honor the brave American servicemembers and Allied forces who stormed the beaches of Normandy, fought and died to save the free world from Nazi oppression.
We owe a debt to these heroes we could never repay.
And some say women are too emotional for positions of leadership 🙄
If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition…
But it isn't. Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego.
$16 million bill for taxpayers just to fix the streets...
And it's entirely separate from the grand total of Cadet Bone Spur’s egotistical, nonsensical birthday parade.
Medicaid is the backbone of maternity care in America.
It's a lifeline for rural and low-income expecting moms to have safe, healthy pregnancies and births.
Republicans cutting Medicaid would lead to countless preventable pregnancy-related deaths.
That is not "pro-life."
You're pregnant and scared.
You're having a medical emergency.
Your health depends on an abortion.
But you may not get one because Trump would rather you be left to die than ensure hospitals perform the live-saving care you need.
Trump's America is a woman's living nightmare.
This is what conmen do. They sell you on a package of lies, then burn you the first chance they get.
Trump promised less government spending and lower costs.
His big, ugly bill would explode the deficit and make health insurance more unaffordable for millions of Americans.
When I was growing up, my dad lost his job and we relied on food stamps to survive.
With Trump’s tariffs raising the costs of food, Republicans' big, ugly bill would slash SNAP.
In Trump’s America, families lose. Every time.
Horrified by the terror attack against peaceful protesters in Boulder, Colorado. My heart goes out to the victims and their loved ones in the wake of this unspeakable tragedy.
Hate of any kind has no place in our country.
This vicious antisemitism has to stop.
Happy Pride! 🏳️🌈
No matter who is in the White House, I will always celebrate, defend and lift up our LGBTQ+ community.
Today, we remember the victims of the Tulsa Race Massacre—a dark, sinister chapter of our history when white supremacists killed hundreds of thriving business owners simply because they were Black.
It's on us to learn from our past and ensure this tragedy never repeats itself.
Illinois is a leader in quantum technology—a perfect place for more business investments from our Indo-Pacific partners abroad.
And I’m as committed as ever to making sure the whole world knows it.
chicago.suntimes.com/politics/202...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-29 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-27 | S. 3627 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (82-15) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-14 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 98 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2026-01-13 | S.J. Res. 84 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-40) |
| 2026-01-08 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-01-07 | S.J. Res. 86 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-01-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-36) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 82 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (50-50) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. Res. 412 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (71-29) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (69-27) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. 1071 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion Agreed to (77-20) |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 1071 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 1071 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Resolution S.Res. 532 | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3385 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3386 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-10 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-12-10 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-12-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-12-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-32) |
| 2025-12-04 | S. Res. 520 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-04 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 131 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-45) |
| 2025-12-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-34) |
| 2025-12-03 | S.J. Res. 91 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-12-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-41) |
| 2025-12-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-40) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-39) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-36) |
| 2025-12-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-12-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-41) |
| 2025-11-20 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 130 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-43) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.