Due to a change in the congressional schedule because of the incoming storm, today’s live conversation will be postponed due to votes. We’ll be posting the new date and time here shortly. Stay tuned!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maryland District 3
Sarah Elfreth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sarah Elfreth
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaryland District 3
SoupScore
Sarah's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 96 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The vast majority of these commonsense provisions were rejected by my Republican colleagues, which is why I will not be supporting the bill.
House Democrats tried to engage in good faith negotiations to include real oversight and accountability of ICE to stop detaining and deporting US citizens, conducting warrantless arrests, and entering homes, schools, and churches.
I will be voting NO on the DHS funding bill. President Trump and Secretary Noem have weaponized ICE against our neighbors here in Maryland and around the country.
The fight for women’s rights and reproductive freedom has spanned generations, and in a post-Roe America, I’m committed to doing my part to keep up the fight.
Just this week, House Republicans brought two bills to the floor that would limit women’s choice and hurt vulnerable women and families and did nothing to expand educational opportunities and protections for women who choose to start a family.
In June of 2022, after the Dobbs decision, I – along with so many other women – woke up with fewer freedoms than I had the day before, and the consequences of this ruling have only worsened in the years since.
Today marks the 53rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. As the youngest woman elected to the Maryland State Senate and the youngest woman elected to Congress from Maryland, I’ve dealt with the reality of a post-Roe world firsthand.
We are all united in the fight for free and fair democracy – that’s why I joined @repyassansari.bsky.social in a bipartisan resolution commending the bravery of the Iranian citizens & recognizing the right of the Iranian people & any people to have a government that reflects the will of the people.
Over the past week, we have seen unprecedented violence in Iran as the Islamic Republic has resorted to using violent military force against civilian protesters who are simply fighting for basic human rights and freedoms.
As a former member of the Women’s Caucus at the State House and now a proud member of the @demwomencaucus.bsky.social, I’m committed to the continued fight for women’s rights here in Congress and alongside our state and local partners.
Since 1972, the Women Legislators of Maryland have been laser-focused on advancing legislation that improves the lives of women and families in Maryland.
I am beyond honored to receive the Women in Government award from the Women Legislators of Maryland Foundation and the Maryland Women’s Caucus alongside @alsobrooks.senate.gov and @repaprildelaney.bsky.social!
In this edition, we’ll be joined by @bynum.house.gov to discuss her commonsense Junk Fee Prevention Act that would lower costs for consumers across the country by cracking down on hidden fees. We’ll be going live TOMORROW, January 22nd, at 3:30 PM EST @RepSarahElfreth on Instagram. Don’t miss it!
That’s why we’re back with another edition of our series where @repjuliejohnson.bsky.social and I sit down with colleagues across the country to highlight all the ways House Democrats are working to tackle the affordability crisis that too many of our neighbors are facing.
President Trump promised to lower costs on day one, yet more than a year into his Administration, we’re still hearing overwhelmingly from our neighbors: sh*t is too expensive!
I will share more reflections on my travel & meetings with our NATO allies both on the House floor and this platform later this week. In the meantime, please know I am more committed than ever to working on a bipartisan basis to protect the United States & preserve our greatest alliance in history.
His means of punishing our strongest allies via tariffs for simply standing behind Article V threatens not just their economies, but ours as well. And the only winners here are our adversaries, chief among them Vladmir Putin.
I'm only grateful – from a purely timing perspective – that the President's letter broke in the news while we were on our way home.
The President's stated motivation to seize Greenland is personal and petty.
I use that word specifically: I just returned from a bipartisan trip to visit our NATO allies Sweden & Finland this weekend, meeting with their Ministers of Defense & Finland's Foreign Minister to discuss our commitment to NATO, Arctic defense, & mutual goal to defend freedom around the world.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.