Their reaction, or lack of a responses, will clearly speak to their values.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 30
Laura Friedman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 30
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Laura Friedman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 30
SoupScore
Laura's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 64 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Sec. Hegseth and the Dept. of Defense are promoting people who espouse antisemitism. This is unacceptable.
Today I led all 21 members of the Congressional Jewish Caucus in demanding accountability from Sec. Hegseth after the Pentagon Press Secretary repeated antisemitic and neo-Nazi rhetoric.
@SecDef's decision to rename the USNS Harvey Milk dishonors the memory of Milk, a dedicated public servant and naval officer, as well as countless LGBTQ service members past and present.
This decision is disrespectful to the sacrifice countless American’s take for our nation.
Last week, I led my House colleagues to demand that the Senate take out a section that would gut our courts’ ability to hold the Trump and the government accountable for breaking the law.
Our demands have become a reality, and Section 203 is OUT. This is one step to holding onto our democracy.
Californian families deserve affordable energy. I’ll keep fighting to make sure our energy production meets the demand from AI while keeping costs down for hardworking Californians.
Reproductive choice is an essential & personal part of healthcare, & I’ll never stop fighting to give our children a future – with choice.
3 years ago today, Roe v. Wade was overturned in the Dobbs decision. Overnight, the rights enjoyed by women in my generation were no longer available to our daughters.
It was never about immigration – it was about hurting states like California that dare stand-up to Trump.
Selective punishment is how you govern if you want to be a king, not President of the United States.
Americans currently in Israel are counting on the US government to protect them & provide a path to safety in the middle of the recent conflict. I signed onto a letter urging the Trump Administration to do just that.
We all want the same thing: wild places that stay public, stay protected, and stay open to everyone.
Democrat or Republican. We hike the same trails. Fish the same waters.
They’re trying to sell off an almost unthinkable amount of OUR land and I’ll be fighting this provision tooth and nail.
That’s what makes this new Senate Republican push to sell off 250 million acres of public lands so outrageous.
It’s not just bad policy — it’s a betrayal of something Americans have always united around: our shared love of the outdoors.
🧵I had Republican partners when I worked on wild and scenic rivers and wetlands protections in the California Assembly. We didn’t always agree — but we stood together to protect the land we all love.
That’s why I’m proud to cosponsor the Closing the Bump Stock Loophole Act, a commonsense bill that prohibits the sale of bump stocks and devices that enable semi-automatic firearms to mimic the effect of fully automatic weapons.
As the Trump administration continues to roll-back gun safety measures, I remain committed to protecting our community from gun violence.
This is the opposite of the Louisiana Purchase — it gives away land roughly the size of Texas, New York, and California combined for pennies on the dollar.
America’s public lands are just that — America’s. Instead, Republicans want to sell off 250 million acres to pay for billionaire tax breaks.
www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/c...
We are thrilled that thousands of visitors will see the work of this talented young artist.
It was an honor to have Mela Gainer, the 1st place winner of my inaugural Congressional Art Competition, and her family in D.C. Her thought-provoking piece titled “Out of Water” is now displayed in the Capitol tunnel representing CA-30.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.