Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Voting Record — 593
Yes76%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

one other thing on this: I think it is likely to have very good outcomes, in practice, to have a large corporate voice with a strong interest in dropped kerbs, level pavements, parking enforcement and enough width on a pavement for two robots to pass each other
Don’t be disheartened America, it’s actually fine having a system that gives effectively unlimited executive power to the head of government. You just have to make sure you only ever elect good chaps to head your government! You did remember to only ever elect good chaps, right
Price. The reason why Starship is preparing to massively ramp up supply is that they can now reliably undercut any courier that uses a person.
to answer a D^2 question in D^2 terms, I think we're also about to find out quite how different personal injury claims are when the thing you're claiming against has an array of always-recording cameras
This is a real issue, and as a pavement user with a disabled child I can confidently say illegally parked cars are not going to be knocked off the top spot for reasons why I have to do dangerous manoeuvres
This is extremely good, delivery robots are such a win. I worry about pavement clutter but they’re far less of an issue on that than lime bikes
You might have already seen them in some places, but a mass of autonomous pavement delivery robots could be coming after ministers signalled they are likely to support a change in the law formally allowing their use, prompting worry from campaigners. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Vastly more interested in “retro graphics, modern gameplay” than the other way round. “This plays just like it did in the 90s” no! I was there! That sucks!
How long before a big studio announces an earnest demake? Huge IP with 2003 visuals. Perhaps this has already happened. I just read books and tend my pumpkin patch.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
593 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 12Next →