Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

So to return to my point--which, if you reread it, was not "games are bad"--people whose PRIMARY growing-up narrative experience is with games sometimes struggle with other forms of narrative. You're free to disagree, but not to disqualify my experience of talking/listening to those people.
In a narrative game, you are largely enacting something rather than simply observing it. The dissonance btw you and your avatar may be interesting or may barely exist, but in either case it is materially different from the experience of entering a story over which you have no control or authorship.>
Historically, do most players consider themselves to be the default good guys in the games they’re playing? I seem to remember reading a great deal about how the choices players had to make in The Last of Us subverted that. Was the idea that there was something to subvert inaccurate?
And if your idea of narrative derives not primarily from books or movies or TV shows but from games in which you ARE the main character, then main characters who are not behaving the way you imagine you would are really going to baffle you. That's how we get to "It's bad that Dr. Robby turned mean!"
I'll just add that if the way you're taught to read texts when you're young is predicated entirely on "relatability" and right v. wrong rather than on empathetic leaps of imagination and the exploration of mixed motives, you're not going to be well prepared to encounter icky things like ambiguity.
"Social identity" and "fan spaces" are completely different concepts in the internet age than they were during most of the 20th century, before fans could communicate with one other daily or hourly in ongoing, publicly visible forums.
Yeah I don't know about highlighting "the growth of fandom as a social identity" as a "scary cultural trend", it's over a hundred years old at this point it's always been chaotic. Keeping it contained in fan spaces has always been the optimal way, but now it's just way too easy to just post shit
Right?! Of all the shows! I was so struck by the "Nobody knows who Noah Wyle is" section because it really brought home to me that what you and I think of as a "traditional" show is actually not part of a tradition that that set of viewers has experienced.
A very astute (and upsetting!) piece that touches on four scary cultural trends: 1) The demand for spelled-out moral clarity in stories 2) A growing inability to understand different types of narratives 3) The "customer's always right" version of fandom 4) The growth of fandom as a social identity.
"The Pitt" vs. its fandom: Why is the show's vocal fandom putting "The Pitt's" characters on trial to be deemed “good” or “bad"? This week's newsletter buttondown.com/NinaWatchesE...
Noah Wyle as Dr. Robby, peaking his head into an examination room, on "The Pitt."
The Fall and Rise of Reggie Dinkins is nakedly an excuse for the 30 Rock team to make jokes about whatever they want to at lightning speed, and I mean that as an unreserved recommendation. Second season, please!
I know Survivor can't turn back the clock to before the invention of reality-competition TV, but one thing it has to do is recognize that the vibe of "Doing this show for the third time will definitely boost my brand" is the death of rooting interest. Who cares which of those people wins $1 million?
People have forgotten that the first truly revolutionary TV moment of the 2000s was Sue Hawk turning to the two finalists 26 years ago and basically saying, I fucking hate both of you and here's why. They were all starving and tired and PISSED. It was not collegial and huggy. It was riveting.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 10Next →