Related: I am now in Year 16 of never quite remembering which Hemsworth that is. This movie has the Thor one.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 613
Yes75%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 75 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Just watched Crime 101--a totally viable, more-than-acceptable Sunday night movie that is trapped in a slightly uncomfortable intermediate tonal place between Michael Mann existential-despair crime thriller and oddball Carl Hiassen everybody-has-a-quirk storytelling. Great cast, polished filmmaking.
Over the last decade, I got as tired as anyone of reading one post after another from people on Twitter and then on Bluesky shouting, "Don't normalize this!" about everything. But the people shouting it were right.
It's not primarily about profanity. It is the open contempt for an entire religion, the threat to send a population to hell, the uncertainty about whether he's the one even posting, the conducting of foreign policy via posts on a for-profit site. I think journalism is too numb to much of this.
This morning, he mocked the dominant religion of a region in which we presumably need allies, essentially using it as a sign-off for a promise of destruction and mayhem. I think that is an action at least as grave as his specific threat, and too many reporters just treat it as hot air.
It's not just AP, as Bluesky has made pretty clear this morning, and we have seen this over and over and over since 2016, in bulletins and stories, in updates and in headlines. It's calmwashing--I, the levelheaded person, will translate objective lunacy into a policy statement.
If you're a journalist looking at what Trump posted this morning and asking, "How do I filter out the noise and get at what he's actually threatening?", with respect, you're missing the fact that the noise--the rage, the profanity, the sneering Islamophobia, the war-movie bluster--is the meaning.
There's a news principle that what someone says matters more than how he says it. Not true with Trump. What he says is made-up, inconsistent, &/or subject to swift reversal. How he says it--in erratic/offensive language, for profit, out of rage, on a site he owns--is the substance of his presidency.
Painful to write, too.
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Tricked Into Thinking He Might Be Dead
I'm not up to the infamous haircut yet, but getting there!
This is fascinating!
This is so real! But I'd learn a lot about the scary and weird adult world from my grandmother's side monologue: "That's Iris...she's rich but she's not happy...she's locked herself in her bedroom with her scissors...they're afraid she's going to hurt herself but she's just going to cut her hair..."
Oh God, I loved that show. Every other recipe was, "....and you want to round out the flavors with a splash of..." and then he would pour a solid half-bottle of red wine into a stewpot and the rest into a giant goblet.
Thank you for this truth.
Plus: Mia Farrow and Ryan O'Neal! And eventually (and spectacularly) Lee Grant! And later: Gena Rowlands! I am 130 episodes into this and I'm going all the way.
2 x weekly (except for one season when it was 3 x weekly), 52 weeks a year!
This is TV from decades before algorithms. It is not worried about holding you every minute. Characters have long conversations. They fret about what to do, what people will think of them. They are not especially interested in their personalities becoming brands. Dosage: 1-2 eps before bedtime.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History613 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
613 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.