Sydney Kamlager-Dove headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 37
Born
July 20, 1972
Age 53
Phone
(202) 225-7084
Office
144 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 37

Sydney Kamlager-Dove

Sydney Kai Kamlager-Dove is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 37th congressional district since 2023. A Democrat, she previously served in the California State Senate, representing the 30th district. She has also served in the California State Assembly and as a trustee for the Los Angeles Community College District.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes38%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 37

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sydney Kamlager-Dove headshot
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 37
SoupScore
Sydney's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 115 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

It was wonderful to tour the Tukatech Innovation Center in the Fashion District last month. As a founding member of the Slow Fashion and Recommerce Caucuses, I’m proud to have innovative companies like Tukatech in my district who are modernizing production and reducing environmental waste.
In 2001, Tatia Oden French and her baby died in the OR after she was given a drug not approved by the FDA, or the drug company, to induce labor. During #BlackMaternalHealthWeek, we shine light on stories like Tatia’s to advance reproductive justice and improve outcomes for Black mamas and babies.
My heart is with the many women and staffers who have carried these burdens for so long and felt unable to come forward until now. Their courage is commendable. I also applaud the reporters and creators who stuck to their guns to ensure these stories were told. (🧵3/4)
I'm horrified by this report of DHS violence against a USC student photographer at LA's No Kings rally. ICE's reign of terror & continued attacks on civilians exercising their First Amendment rights must end. There must be an immediate investigation. We'll hold them accountable.
While I am grateful that this threat wasn’t realized, let’s be clear about what this ceasefire is: Trump trying and failing to backpedal on the self-inflicted fallout of a conflict that has predictably left the United States and the world worse off than before. 2/3
In 12 hours Trump went from threatening to wipe out 90 million Iranians to capitulating to all of Iran’s demands. That willingness to commit unspeakable atrocities is not a “negotiating tactic,” it demonstrates Trump’s severe mental instability. 1/3
I’m sick to my stomach. The fate of millions of innocent civilians now depends on the whims of a sick and demented man. This is pure evil. Republicans, if there were ever a time to stand up, it’s now. We must invoke the 25th Amendment before it’s too late.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-09H.R. 1526 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 10Next →