Trump’s pushing an offshore drilling plan that will threaten California’s coasts. California can’t allow it, and if Trump really cared about energy supply, he’d stop canceling projects across the country and driving up costs.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 18
Zoe Lofgren
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 18
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Zoe Lofgren
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 18
SoupScore
Zoe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 110 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Looks like there is a massive coverup of the Epstein files from Trump and his enablers in Congress. Thankfully, in just a few hours, Adelita Grijalva will finally be sworn in and we will be one step closer to getting transparency.
House Democrats on Wednesday released emails in which Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump had “spent hours at my house” with one of the convicted sex offender’s victims, among other messages that suggested Epstein believed Trump knew more about his abuse than he has acknowledged. nyti.ms/441Dyxh
This Veterans Day, we honor all the courageous Americans who have served our country in uniform. Thank you for your bravery and commitment to our nation’s security.
Republicans don’t have a plan for healthcare. They haven’t for decades. They’re just blowing up the Affordable Care Act with no better alternative, all to benefit their wealthy friends.
The deal being considered right now by the Senate fails millions of people. Americans need their healthcare costs lowered NOW, not the “promise of a vote” in a month which will go nowhere.
Watch my full interview on @nbcnews.com with Hallie Jackson: youtu.be/0JwbeLuBaKI?...
It would cost $38 billion to extend ACA credits next year and prevent millions of people from losing their healthcare.
Reminder: Trump sent $40 billion to Argentina for no reason.
Someone who graduated from Yale Law School should be well aware that we have checks and balances in this country. Stop starving Americans and release the SNAP funds.
Why doesn’t Trump focus on affordability NOW by telling Republicans in Congress to prevent skyrocketing premiums by extending ACA tax credits and repealing Medicaid cuts? This can’t wait until next year.
Nancy Pelosi will be remembered as the most effective Speaker in history. I’ve been proud to be her colleague and friend for many years, and the work she’s done to uplift the most vulnerable makes both California and our country grateful to have such a dedicated public servant.
The Republican agenda: starving hungry Americans while giving $40 billion to Argentina.
Trump keeps saying grocery prices are “way down”. Anyone who’s been in a grocery store knows that’s a lie. Trump’s more worried about his billionaire friends than the Americans being crushed by his tariffs.
It shouldn’t take court rulings for the Trump administration to understand that starving Americans for political purposes is wrong. It’s time for Republicans to get back to Washington and work with Democrats.
Reposted byRep. Zoe Lofgren
House Democrats are fighting to protect health care and SNAP.
It’s time for House Republicans to get serious and work with us to reopen the government.
🗳️ A reminder to Californians that Election Day is next week on Tuesday, November 4th. For reliable voter information, visit sos.ca.gov/elections.
Read our committee’s letter to DOJ officials: democrats-judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
Donald Trump is trying to rip off the taxpayers by compensating himself $230 million for his criminal cases. It’s unconstitutional, and my @democrats-judiciary.house.gov colleagues and I are demanding documents from the DOJ on Trump’s shakedown.
#CA18 student coders and innovators: today is the last day to submit your apps for the Congressional App Challenge! I am looking forward to seeing what you have created!
Watch my full interview with @meiselasb.bsky.social at @meidastouch.com: youtu.be/Vwaj50Jm5rs?...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 10 / 10