And what I heard today was a desperation, a need for immediate action. Thank you to so many members of our Iranian community for sharing your concerns about the Iranian regime with me today.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Nevada District 3
Susie Lee
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes48%
No49%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Susie Lee
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNevada District 3
SoupScore
Susie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 85 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We have such a strong Persian diaspora here in southern Nevada, so it was important for me to be on the ground, listening to members of our community who have friends and family in Iran, to understand what's going on.
This is another deadly example of ICE’s lawless actions making our communities less safe. This reckless violence and terror must end. (2/2)
Another U.S. citizen has been shot and killed by ICE in Minneapolis, this time a 37-year-old ICU nurse, Alex Pretti. I’m calling for an immediate, impartial, and transparent investigation - with appropriate state and local involvement, congressional oversight, and full accountability. (1/2)
This was entirely preventable. I voted to keep health care costs from skyrocketing but Republicans in Washington decided to do nothing ⬇️
Today would have been the 53rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
While abortion is safe and legal in Nevada, women across this country do not have the freedom to make their own medical decisions.
We must restore Roe and make it the law of the land once again.
We must restore checks and balances to ensure ICE abides by the Constitution. Until then, I cannot support sending them billions in extra funding. (9/9)
This vote is about sending a clear message: in America, we have laws that apply to everyone – including law enforcement. Over the summer, Republicans in Congress forced through a $150 billion blank check for ICE, funding these unconstitutional operations without guardrails or oversight. (8/9)
However, Republicans rejected several opportunities to ensure such guardrails were included, such as requiring ICE to obtain warrants, mandating officers wear body cameras and proper identification, enforcing use of force standards, and prohibiting arresting U.S. citizens. (7/9)
Had this DHS appropriations bill included appropriate reforms and accountability measures, I would have likely supported it. (6/9)
As such, I will be voting against providing over $10 billion extra in taxpayer money to fund an agency that is blatantly violating Americans’ constitutional rights and terrorizing our communities. This is not law enforcement. (5/9)
American citizens are being grabbed off the streets and out of their homes without warrants and mistakenly deported. (4/9)
Earlier this month, our country watched in horror as ICE agents shot a young mother point blank, and just yesterday we received appalling reports that a 5-year-old had been arrested and sent to a detention facility 1,000 miles away from his home. (3/9)
Under this Administration, ICE has shown blatant disregard for the rule of law and gone well beyond its purpose, engaging in unconstitutional activities. (2/9)
I support law enforcement and the critical role that ICE should play in enforcing our nation's immigration laws. Violent criminals who are in this country illegally should be deported, and we have due process and laws that dictate how we enforce that. (1/9)
Why I’m Voting Against Funding Lawless ICE Activities 🧵
Economic chaos coming from the Trump Administration is raising costs, not lowering them.
Nevada families paid $1,565 more this past year because of inflation under President Trump. I’m fighting to stop this chaos and make life more affordable.
So glad my team could celebrate Timket (Ethiopian Epiphany) with our vibrant Ethiopian community here in southern Nevada!
16 years ago, the Supreme Court made a decision that has transformed our politics to favor Big Money over the American people.
We need a constitutional amendment to formally and fully overturn the Citizens United decision.
⚠️BIG NEWS for NV Energy customers!
I’m doing everything I can to keep energy costs low and ensure corporations aren’t taking more of your hard earned than they should.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.