I agree that we need to lower home prices and boost the housing supply. That’s why @cortezmasto.senate.gov and I have introduced our bipartisan Clark County lands bill, which would help do just that. 🧵 (1/6)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Nevada District 3
Susie Lee
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes49%
No49%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Susie Lee
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNevada District 3
SoupScore
Susie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 85 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’m fighting to protect access to care for all women.
The Administration and Congressional Republicans are pushing their ‘Big Bullshit Bill’ which will defund Planned Parenthood health centers — which also provide critical care like cancer screenings and STI testing and treatment — and prevent certain health insurers from offering abortion coverage.
With the fall of Roe v. Wade three years ago, millions of women across America were stripped of the freedom to make choices about their own bodies.
As always, and especially now with Iran launching missiles toward U.S. bases in the Middle East, the safety of our servicemembers in the region should be the White House’s top priority. My thoughts are with our troops and their families back home. America’s ultimate goal must be peace. (4/4)
I'm grateful that no U.S. servicemembers were harmed this weekend during the strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities. (3/4)
It cannot be forgotten that the Iranian regime is responsible for funding global terrorism and killing Americans. The regime’s goal is to access nuclear weapons to use against America, Israel, and our other allies. (2/4)
While I await a briefing on the intelligence that led to the strikes and on the status of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, I remain firm in my commitment that Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. 🧵(1/4)
For decades, federal law has made sure money from land sales stays in Nevada to invest in our water infrastructure, schools, and parks. Congressional Republicans want to change that so that they can pay for their billionaire tax breaks.
Even Trump’s Secretary Burgum knows it’s wrong. He told me that “land sales are always sensitive, and they're always determined by the local partners.”
He also praised the longtime law that keeps the proceeds from Nevada land sales in Nevada as a “great model.”
After we stopped a similar effort in the House, Senate Republicans have a new plan in their budget bill — crafted behind closed doors, without any meaningful local input — to sell off millions of acres of public land, including in NV.
www.youtube.com/shorts/jiKNd...
When Congressional Republicans:
-Cut healthcare and close hospitals
-End food assistance programs
-Add $2.8 trillion to our debt
-Enable cost-raising tariffs
It makes life harder and more expensive for working families and it’s the wealthiest Americans who will benefit the most from tax breaks.
160 years ago, the last enslaved African Americans in Texas finally heard the words of their freedom — two years after the Emancipation Proclamation.
#Juneteenth is a reminder of the progress we have made and the work we must do to create a more perfect union.
They have no feasible plan to build more homes while also protecting our iconic public lands and water supply.
Plus, their budget bill will add $2.8 trillion to the debt.
The reason congressional Republicans want to sell off millions of acres of public lands in America and Nevada — as part of a partisan budget process without any local input — is to subsidize the reckless spending and billionaire tax cuts in their Big Bullshit Bill.
Amazing! Congratulations to West Tech’s own Micah Campisi, this year’s #NV03 Congressional Art Competition Winner.
Micah’s painting titled “Bluebird Finds Home” is now hanging in the halls of Congress for all to see!
For decades, federal law has made sure money from land sales stays in Nevada to invest in our water infrastructure, schools, and parks. Congressional Republicans want to change that so that they can pay for their billionaire tax breaks.
FYI: If we let Senate Republicans sell off these lands in Clark County, the money from land sales would go straight to Washington.
www.8newsnow.com/news/local-n...
Thank you for writing to me, Seth — my note back to you is in the mail! I will continue to work with both Democrats and Republicans to make sure we continue investing in the fight against climate change and to protect our water.
Seth, a Scout in Las Vegas’ Troop 407, wrote to me about tackling climate change and the importance of water conservation in Nevada.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.