Members of Congress asked about accountability.
Bondi deflected and pointed to… the stock market.
Justice isn’t measured by the Dow Jones.
Survivors deserved truth but instead they got excuses and her performance for Dear Leader. Just pathetic.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Pam Bondi’s testimony was a total disgrace. Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse were sitting in the room.
Please stop scrolling for a minute and read this story. Children should never be treated this way. This is not about a policy disagreement. It is a complete moral failure.
A decent country protects children, period.
What in the hell is wrong with these people?
www.propublica.org/article/life...
Reposted byMike Levin
The new rule is, “Give us your social media or don’t visit America.” The result is millions of tourists stay away.
Hotels, restaurants, and small businesses lose billions.
Jobs disappear while other countries take our visitors and our money.
Just unbelievably dumb.
For decades, America proved we could grow our economy and clean up pollution at the same time. Walking away from that progress is reckless and just flat out stupid.
Pollution doesn’t disappear because politicians pretend it isn’t dangerous. It shows up as higher health care costs, higher insurance premiums, destroyed homes, and more expensive energy. Families pay the price while polluters boost their profits.
This is not just wrong. It’s absolutely idiotic.
Clean energy is lowering costs and creating American jobs right now. Abandoning pollution limits doesn’t help our economy, it weakens it and hands our competitors an advantage.
The new rule is, “Give us your social media or don’t visit America.” The result is millions of tourists stay away.
Hotels, restaurants, and small businesses lose billions.
Jobs disappear while other countries take our visitors and our money.
Just unbelievably dumb.
Reposted byMike Levin
Reminder that Trump and Republicans are pouring billions of your tax dollars into ICE raids and crackdowns, while gutting Medicaid and SNAP and driving up health care costs.
Families are get crushed by rent, groceries, prescriptions. They chose fear and cruelty while working people pay the price.
Reminder that Trump and Republicans are pouring billions of your tax dollars into ICE raids and crackdowns, while gutting Medicaid and SNAP and driving up health care costs.
Families are get crushed by rent, groceries, prescriptions. They chose fear and cruelty while working people pay the price.
Reposted byMike Levin
The health costs of failing to fix the Tijuana River crisis are far too high for families and our service members to pay. Our delegation has secured $653M since I arrived in Congress in 2019, and real progress is finally underway.
But the job isn’t finished.
I’ll keep fighting until it’s done.
Reposted byMike Levin
This is just idiotic.
More pollution means more hospital visits, more floods and fires, higher insurance, higher food and energy costs, and billions in taxpayer disaster relief.
At the same time, we’re handing clean energy jobs and manufacturing to China. Trump and Republicans want us to literally pay more to get sicker and weaker.
Total economic and environmental malpractice.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/09/c...
This is just idiotic.
More pollution means more hospital visits, more floods and fires, higher insurance, higher food and energy costs, and billions in taxpayer disaster relief.
The health costs of failing to fix the Tijuana River crisis are far too high for families and our service members to pay. Our delegation has secured $653M since I arrived in Congress in 2019, and real progress is finally underway.
But the job isn’t finished.
I’ll keep fighting until it’s done.
Reposted byMike Levin
It’s worth briefly explaining what happened with a vote in the House late last night, because it’s significant:
Mike Johnson and House Republican leaders tried to keep blocking Congress from voting on whether to roll back Trump’s tariffs on countries like Canada.
This is the choice in Washington: Trump’s tariffs or lower prices for you.
I know which side I’m on.
Nonpartisan experts estimate these tariffs cost the average household about $1,300 a year.
Republican leaders tried to protect that tax instead of protecting families.
Trump’s tariffs are a massive hidden tax on working families.
Foreign countries don’t pay them.
You do.
At the grocery store. At the mall. At the auto shop. When you replace an appliance.
Now we can force votes to lower costs, bring prices down, and stop this administration from re-imposing the same tariffs without Congress.
Here’s why this matters:
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | PRESENT | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.