Since then, states, providers, and families have reported growing disruptions and loss of access to care.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Last summer, they passed the largest cut to Medicaid in history, slashing hundreds of billions in funding over the coming years and adding new administrative barriers that independent analysts warned would push millions off coverage.
I’m fed up with Republicans in Congress treating Americans’ health care with reckless disregard.
That is how innocent people get hurt.
When an agency says it can police itself, approve its own warrants, and kick down doors, it is out of control. No president and no agency is above the Constitution.
For decades, courts have ruled that even police with probable cause need a real warrant to enter a home. Immigration officers do not get a special pass. No agency gets to rewrite the Constitution in a secret memo.
This policy destroys due process and invites abuse.
The Fourth Amendment is clear that government agents cannot force their way inside your home without permission from a neutral judge, except in true emergencies.
A piece of paper signed by ICE itself does not count.
ICE is claiming it can break into people’s homes without a judge’s warrant.
That is illegal and unconstitutional.
apnews.com/article/ice-...
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump’s threats to seize Greenland hand Vladimir Putin exactly what he wants.
Putin has worked to weaken NATO, and now a U.S. president is openly bullying a NATO ally, Denmark.
The Kremlin is barely hiding its delight and comparing a U.S. grab of Greenland to Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.
That should set off every alarm bell.
When an American president normalizes territorial coercion, it shatters our moral authority to deter aggression around the world.
Trump’s threats to seize Greenland hand Vladimir Putin exactly what he wants.
Putin has worked to weaken NATO, and now a U.S. president is openly bullying a NATO ally, Denmark.
The Kremlin is barely hiding its delight and comparing a U.S. grab of Greenland to Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.
Reposted byMike Levin
Corruption, plain and simple.
A senior Trump official met with a company seeking federal approval while her family stood to pocket $3.5M if that deal went through, then failed to disclose it. That’s a textbook abuse of power. Congress must investigate fully and hold those responsible accountable.
Reposted byMike Levin
Just a reminder that Stephen Miller is the shadow president.
An unelected ideologue shaping immigration policy through mass deportation quotas, extreme enforcement tactics, and political loyalty tests.
He wields enormous power with little oversight. He is dangerous and must be held accountable.
Corruption, plain and simple.
A senior Trump official met with a company seeking federal approval while her family stood to pocket $3.5M if that deal went through, then failed to disclose it. That’s a textbook abuse of power. Congress must investigate fully and hold those responsible accountable.
Just a reminder that Stephen Miller is the shadow president.
An unelected ideologue shaping immigration policy through mass deportation quotas, extreme enforcement tactics, and political loyalty tests.
He wields enormous power with little oversight. He is dangerous and must be held accountable.
Reposted byMike Levin
We even tried to add a ban on the deportation of American citizens, and the Republicans in Congress rejected all of it!
Every single piece.
Reposted byMike Levin
I’ll be voting NO on the Homeland Security appropriations bill.
We pushed hard to add basic accountability measures when it comes to ICE, including warrant requirements, body cameras, and limits on excessive force.
That reality makes one thing clear.
The GOP will not stand up for the rule of law, or for our Constitutional rights.
Real accountability will require a Democratic majority in the House, and I’m committed to fighting for that so we can finally bring this agency under control.
Folks should know that last summer, the same Republicans jammed through their Big Ugly Bill that handed ICE nearly $75 BILLION.
So even if we block this funding bill, ICE will still be able to operate for now.
We even tried to add a ban on the deportation of American citizens, and the Republicans in Congress rejected all of it!
Every single piece.
I’ll be voting NO on the Homeland Security appropriations bill.
We pushed hard to add basic accountability measures when it comes to ICE, including warrant requirements, body cameras, and limits on excessive force.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.