This is just the beginning.
Hundreds of thousands of Ohioans will lose their healthcare because they decided to cut their healthcare in order to pay for tax cuts for the super-wealthy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes48%
No51%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 136 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Women rely on these clinics for cancer screenings. Because of their horrible bill, women lost their healthcare provider.
It’s absolutely an attack on women.
🧵👇🏼
www.cincinnati.com/story/news/p...
Public TV and radio matter — especially in our small communities.
We’re fighting to protect them.
www.cincinnati.com/story/news/p...
Read more: landsman.house.gov/posts/landsm...
Veterans deserve the best care, including safer options to manage pain.
Our bipartisan NOPAIN for Veterans Act will make non-opioid pain management options more affordable and accessible.
Veterans need addiction-free pain management. We’re on it.
Our bipartisan NOPAIN for Veterans Act. 👇🏼
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
70% of ICE detainees have no criminal record. What are they doing?!
🚨Our bipartisan bill, the Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act, passed the House.
Foreign adversaries are actively working to divide us - this bill will strengthen our communications systems, critical to national security and keeping Americans safe.
A great time at our 3rd annual Preschool and Popsicles event.
We helped families register their kids for preschool and connected them with local resources.
Looking forward to next year. 🙏 💙
Whoever leads the Federal Bureau of Prisons should be confirmed by Congress.
Our bipartisan bill would require this new level of accountability.
gantnews.com/2025/07/13/t...
Reposted byCongressman Greg Landsman
Inside Scoop: How Congress Plans to Crush Putin and Rescue Kidnapped Ukrainian Kids
youtu.be/Tepm4WtFAXc
Their budget bill is core to what’s broken with our economy – taking over a trillion dollars from the healthcare system to pay for trillions in tax cuts to billionaires and big corporate investors.
@joeycontino.bsky.social
Tomorrow is our Preschool & Popsicles event for all children and families in SW Ohio!
Connect with resources, sign up for preschool, and enjoy fun summer activities.
RSVP: www.eventbrite.com/e/1462384424...
We are in an incredibly critical moment with our national security and in global negotiations.
Firing experienced national security staff is so irresponsible and dangerous.
The path to peace requires people doing the hard work to make it happen.
While we cannot go into every detail, we are working to ensure Ayman receives due process, are pushing for him to be treated fairly, and are doing everything we can to keep him here at home.
We have secured a commitment that Ayman will be able to stay in Ohio for the time being – prior to his next appearances before the immigration court.
We expect this to be a long process that he and his attorneys will be navigating.
At every step of the way – before he was detained, afterward, and going forward – we have been and will continue working hand in hand with his legal team.
We have been working on Ayman’s case for months – well before this became public.
An update on Ayman’s case:
We spoke at length today with ICE officials – making the case for why Ayman deserves to remain in our community.
🧵👇🏼
www.wlwt.com/article/cinc...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | PRESENT | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.