Trump is claiming Republicans are going to balance the budget. Republicans don't have any actual budget plans that would do this. They have a plan to give the wealthiest Americans a tax cut.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 7
Doris O. Matsui
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 7
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Doris O. Matsui
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 7
SoupScore
Doris O.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As co-author of the CHIPS Act, I know well that securing our domestic supply chain is an economic and national security imperative. Getting rid of CHIPS would be catastrophic. We cannot and will not put up a white flag on global innovation leadership.
Donald Trump claims “free speech is back” while he works to censor dissent and bully our media with baseless attacks. We know he likes a news outlet he can control — and hates when the American people seek the truth.
Never has a president used a joint address to be cruel to the very people he is sworn to serve and protect. A President’s words hold weight — and have the power to crush. True leadership uses that power to uplift. This is shameful.
Later today, Donald Trump will deliver an address to a Joint Session of Congress. We already know that he’s going to play the blame game and peddle the same lies he always does.
But we won’t be fooled by this speech tonight. We see what he is really doing.
youtu.be/2tgJ8sXalew
As a member of the @demwomencaucus.bsky.social, I’m wearing pink to protest Trump betraying women & families for his billionaire buddies.
Women can’t afford Trump. We can’t afford eggs, we can’t afford attacks on our health care, & we can’t afford the discrimination & abuse by his administration.
From directing federal agencies to pause federal funding disbursements to firing civil servants, Trump's actions are impacting individuals who depend on gov't services in their lives.
I want to hear directly from you—fill out this form if you’ve been impacted ⬇️
matsui.house.gov/services/sha...
It was wonderful meeting with Mayor Kevin McCarty, the new Mayor of Sacramento, to discuss his priorities and plans for Sacramentans.
I look forward to working with him to continue delivering results for Sacramento.
It was great meeting with West Sacramento’s city manager and senior staff to celebrate the city’s achievements as well as discuss priorities for 2025.
I look forward to working with them to ensure that we’re doing all we can to help and serve West Sacramentans this year.
It was great to meet with the City of Sacramento’s Acting City Manager, Leyne Milstein and her team to discuss their priorities for 2025.
I’m looking forward to working with them to ensure critical federal funding remains available for the many projects that will improve the lives of Sacramentans.
I met with Kim Johnson, @calhhs.bsky.social Secretary, to discuss our home state's health priorities.
I look forward to working with Secretary Johnson as we continue to make health care affordable and accessible and confront challenges during this turbulent time in our country.
#RamadanMubarak! Ramadan is a sacred time for reflection and prayer. Wishing everyone who celebrates in the Sacramento region and the country a month of reflection and peace.
Trump is weaponizing the FCC to silence broadcast media by initiating investigations into news outlets that dare to challenge Trump’s viewpoint. I urge my GOP colleagues to not allow Trump’s FCC to run roughshod over the 1st Amendment—which Republicans always claim to defend.
youtu.be/-GDriO-LGDs
President Trump had an opportunity to reassure the world that our nation is committed to defending democracy. Instead, he used it as an opportunity to denigrate President Zelensky and let Putin know he doesn’t need to change course. Ukraine needs our support, democracy needs our support.
.@noaa.gov is a vital government agency. It's our nation’s primary climate research source & delivers critical services & data that serve our farmers, our military & our ability to protect our supply chain.
Trump & Musk dismantling NOAA is beyond dangerous, it’s deadly.
www.cnn.com/2025/02/27/p...
As the Trump Administration continues its attacks—I'm focused on ensuring that our non-profits are able to continue their vital work.
That's why I got together with Chet Hewitt, Sierra Health Foundation CEO, to convene a meeting of our community leaders to talk about how we can fight back.
Trump fired 3,400 federal workers from the U.S. Forest Service, undermining the country's ability to respond to crises caused by climate change & upending the livelihoods Americans across the country.
That's why I signed onto a letter urging Trump & Secretary Rollins to reverse these firings.
The Republican budget would rip away the Prevention & Public Health Fund, which prepares us for future pandemics & public health threats.
That’s why I introduced the Public Health Funding Restoration Act, which would fund the PPHF & keep America healthy & thriving.
matsui.house.gov/media/press-...
The Trump Admin could hold hostage federal funding that would implement broadband affordability & digital equity programs.
That’s why I’m fighting for the Energy and Commerce Committee to ensure that the Admin is following the law—& that not only the wealthy can get online.
youtu.be/vAMCxH2Tnkc?...
The Stockton Boulevard Partnership is linking together our businesses, researchers, & community organizations to attract new investment in our communities, encourage economic growth & provide good jobs.
I'll always fight to make sure Stockton Boulevard has the support it needs at the federal level.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.