Jerrold Nadler headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 12
Born
June 13, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 225-5635
Office
2132 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12

Jerrold Nadler

Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American lawyer and politician from the state of New York. A resident of Manhattan's Upper West Side and a member of the Democratic Party, he has served as a U.S. Congressman since 1992. From 1992 until 2022, Nadler's district covered the west side of Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, being numbered the 17th district, then the 8th district, and then the 10th district in 2013. Since 2023, he has represented the 12th district, which covers both the west and east sides of Manhattan from 14th Street to 110th Street. Before his election to Congress, he served eight terms as a New York state assemblyman. Nadler is the dean of New York's U.S. House delegation and is known for his liberal record and close local ties.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 12

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jerrold Nadler headshot
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 148 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

When I introduced legislation to make Stonewall a national monument in 2015, I specifically directed the National Park Service to uplift the contributions of trans women of color. The Trump administration’s attempt to erase their role in the Stonewall uprising is shameful.
First, Trump unconstitutionally launched strikes on Iran without seeking congressional approval for a declaration of war or an Authorization for Use of Military Force. Now, his Administration is canceling classified briefings meant to inform Congress of the results. What exactly are they hiding?
The public rightfully doesn’t support kicking 15 million people off their health insurance, slashing food assistance to less than $5 a day, or selling off public lands—all to fund another round of tax breaks for billionaires.
Republicans are racing to jam their dangerous reconciliation bill through Congress, but no matter how fast they move, they can’t outrun the fact that the majority of Americans reject their cruel bill.
How Americans feel about the One Big Beautiful Bill: FOX NEWS: 38% favorable, 59% unfavorable QUINNIPIAC: 27% favorable, 53% unfavorable KFF: 35% favorable, 64% unfavorable PEW: 29% favorable, 49% unfavorable WaPo-IPSOS: 23% favorable, 42% unfavorable www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...
Today, I reintroduced the Refuge from Cruel Trapping Act, which would ban cruel body-gripping traps in our National Wildlife Refuges. These public lands should be safe for people, pets, and wildlife — not littered with dangerous traps.
Today’s ceasefire announcement is but one step. I pray that this ceasefire puts us on a path in the Middle East to realize the vision articulated in the book of Isaiah: “nation shall not lift up sword against nation; neither shall they learn war anymore.”
I also remain resolute that, regardless of the outcome, the Trump Administration’s military action against Iran was unconstitutional, as only Congress has the power to authorize the use of military force.
While I continue to affirm the importance of American assistance and action to defend Israel and am clear-eyed about Iran’s state sponsor of terrorist proxies throughout the region.
As I return to Washington this evening, I look forward to learning more about the impact the United States’ attack has had on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
I welcome the news of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The violence has cost too many innocent lives and inflicted too much destruction on innocent civilians.
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war. The President’s action will without a doubt lead to many American, Israeli and Iranian deaths and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
Today’s decision is a welcome rebuke of the Trump Administration’s weaponization of antisemitism for their own political gain. Indeed, as I have said, if the Trump White House were serious about rooting out antisemitism in America, they should start with their own Administration.
The court’s decision today affirms the principles of due process and civil liberties that must remain at the core of our country’s values and rule of law.
While I do not agree with all of the content of Mr. Khalil’s protected speech, we must protect these rights even and especially of those who exercise protected speech we disagree with.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 10Next →