Jerrold Nadler headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 12
Born
June 13, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 225-5635
Office
2132 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12

Jerrold Nadler

Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American lawyer and politician from the state of New York. A resident of Manhattan's Upper West Side and a member of the Democratic Party, he has served as a U.S. Congressman since 1992. From 1992 until 2022, Nadler's district covered the west side of Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, being numbered the 17th district, then the 8th district, and then the 10th district in 2013. Since 2023, he has represented the 12th district, which covers both the west and east sides of Manhattan from 14th Street to 110th Street. Before his election to Congress, he served eight terms as a New York state assemblyman. Nadler is the dean of New York's U.S. House delegation and is known for his liberal record and close local ties.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 12

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jerrold Nadler headshot
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 148 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Remember when some Republicans admitted they didn’t even realize some of the terrible provisions that were buried in the dangerous reconciliation bill until after they voted for it? One even said they would’ve voted no if they’d actually known what was in it.
Trump is once again siding with corporate polluters over the American people by ripping up the strongest pollution requirements for power plants in US history. His shameful decision will lead to more toxic mercury and carbon pollution in our air, putting public health at risk.
Trump's admin is wiping out climate limits on power plants. That leaves a major source of pollution free of checks to address global warming.
Today, they have a choice when they vote for technical changes to reconciliation: Double down on stripping health care from millions, or finally listen to the overwhelming majority of Americans and vote no on $800 billion in devastating Medicaid cuts.
A new Quinnipiac University poll found that just 10% of Americans support cutting Medicaid. But last month, nearly every House Republican voted for the largest Medicaid cut in American history.
Everyone should be able to obtain or provide health care without fear of violence, harassment, or intimidation. Democrats stand united firmly behind the FACE Act, and we will fight back to keep the health care providers and patients in our communities safe.
Today’s hearing is part of a wider Republican attack on women. Just last week, House Republicans passed a budget bill that would defund Planned Parenthood. This is just the next step in their dangerous plan to eliminate access to abortion nationwide.
We never received a response. However, Donald Trump did pardon 23 people convicted of violating the FACE Act because they barricaded abortion clinics with chains and bike locks, harassed patients and providers, and assaulted clinic staff.
That’s why this Congress, I’ve already sent two letters with Rep. Casten and Rep. Schakowsky to the U.S. Attorney General explaining the importance of enforcing the FACE Act and asking what Congress can do to support the DOJ in enforcing the FACE Act.
Just four days ago, there was a horrific bombing of American Reproductive Centers of Palm Springs, the Coachella Valley’s only full-service fertility clinic.
We know, however, that anti-abortion violence didn’t end in the 90s. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, incidents targeting abortion clinics and providers have been on the rise again, including arsons, burglaries, obstructions, assaults, and death threats.
The consequences of repealing the FACE Act are not theoretical. The House unanimously passed the FACE Act in the 1990s following the violent murder of an OB/GYN, Dr. David Gunn, by an anti-abortion extremist outside a women’s clinic in Pensacola, Florida.
Let’s be clear about exactly what’s going on here – Republicans hope that an increase in violence at reproductive health clinics will discourage women from accessing essential health care. As I said in committee, unless we support violence, we should oppose this bill.
My House Republican colleagues just proposed to repeal the FACE Act, the bipartisan bill that protects people receiving or providing reproductive care from violence or obstruction to receiving that care.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 10Next →