Saddened to hear of the horrific Air India crash in #Ahmedabad today, which may be the worst aviation disaster since 2014.
I want to express my sincerest condolences to the families of the victims and urge the authorities to conduct a full investigation.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
#DonaldTrump keeps threatening to arrest @governor.ca.gov #Newsom
I've said it before, and said it again this morning on @cnn.com:
"If we're going to arrest any of the most prominent public officials, we should start with the one with 34 felony convictions."
I joined @cnn.com earlier today to discuss the latest on #DonaldTrump's response to the protests in #LosAngeles
Watch ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsOO...
I will be appearing on @cnn.com this morning at 9:20 AM EST/6:20 AM PT to discuss the latest developments on #DonaldTrump's unlawful and dangerous actions against Los Angeles.
Trump is shaping the narrative to make it seem as though riots are happening throughout LA. This is not the case. Only a small part of the City of LA has been subject to reports of violence.
I am proud to have drafted a statement signed by many of my Jewish colleagues about her outrageous antisemitic behavior. 3/3
Instead of demonstrating that the UN can address issues such as antisemitism from within and prevent continued efforts to undermine the UN’s credibility, Secretary General Guterres extended Ms. Albanese’s employment. 2/3
UN Special Rapporteur Albanese’s long history of antisemitism – she has regularly used antisemitic terms like the ‘Jewish lobby,’ taken money from pro-Hamas groups, and claims that Israel doesn’t have the right to defend itself or even to exist. 1/3
It's time for #DonaldTrump to fire #KristiNoem. Especially in light of the horrific January wildfires, the administration should be helping our city.
Instead, Noem calls L.A. a "city of criminals" — And refuses to apologize.
Today I stood in solidarity with my California Congressional colleagues in a press conference on the #Trump Administration's unlawful and dangerous actions against #LosAngeles
See highlights of my remarks ⬇️
Outrageous.
The #Trump administration should be spending that type of money to help Los Angeles recover from the January wildfires -- instead of working to start new fires.
www.politico.com/news/2025/06...
#KristiNoem say Los Angeles is a “city of criminals"
I love L.A. and apparently the #Trump administration hates L.A.
2/2
Read our statement below ⬇️
sherman.house.gov/media-center...
The Jewish community is reeling from terrorist attacks in DC & Boulder. I've drafted a statement which many Jewish Members joined demanding leadership take real action: pass the #Antisemitism Awareness Act & fund the Security Grant Program. Non-binding resolutions/platitudes no longer cut it. 1/2
Hey @nytimes.com fixed the headline for you.
I joined BBC News to discuss President #Trump's ICE raids in #LosAngeles
Watch ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCxc...
So why are you bragging about quickly completing a permit process that involves almost no permits?
Second, the people covering their faces are the ICE officers. 2/2
There is so much wrong with #Trump’s statement, let me correct him on two points.
First, as the Congressional Representative for the Pacific Palisades, I should remind the President that there are virtually no federal permits that homeowners and businesses need. 1/2
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.