Today marks the first day of winter, and the Trump administration is leaving my constituents out in the cold.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 9
Adam Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam Smith
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 9
SoupScore
Adam's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 97 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Understanding your fiscal stance and where you can spend money can help build your career path, workforce development training, and more.
Interesting idea by Treasurer Pellicciotti to teach financial education in high schools. There are multiple pathways for our state’s students can take, but regardless of what they are, funding your future is incredibly important.
I joined @cspanwj.bsky.social this morning the discuss the President's use of his powers.
To honor federal workers' rights, it is essential that safe and fair labor practices are upheld for correctional departments across our country.
The BOP's decision to cancel their collective bargaining agreement jeopardized worker safety, fair treatment, accountability, and staff morale, while harming both employees and the prison system at large.
After seeing the impact on FDC SeaTac, I signed onto a letter urging restoration of collective bargaining rights at the Bureau of Prisons.
As the President continues his racist tirades against immigrants, I want to reaffirm my commitment to supporting all members of our community. Diverse contributions to our culture, livelihood, economy, and overall wellbeing are essential. We will not let his hatred divide us.
I joined @cnn.com to discuss the release of the videos of boat strikes.
Incredible comeback win for the Hawks last night. Exciting year. Looking forward to the rest of the season and the playoffs. Go Hawks!
I have proposed multiple pieces of legislation to push for more accessibility to these programs for young Washingtonians who are searching for their next steps. Not only does it help their livelihoods, but it also builds local economies and the state workforce.
This is precisely why we need more career pathways outside of a four-year college education. By funding workforce development programs and enabling wrap-around services, it addresses fundamental barriers that bar individuals from high-quality jobs.
“Nearly 100,000 16-to-24-year-olds in Washington are neither in school nor employed, and a quarter of them live in King and Pierce counties.”
This is great, commonsense legislation to support individuals like truck drivers, pipeline operators, longshoremen, and warehouse managers.
The Transportation Security Screening Modernization Act would eliminate redundant fees and background checks that prevent transportation employees from fully participatingtaking part in the workforce.
A year ago, my bipartisan bill to streamline clearance process for transportation workers passed the House of Representatives, another step closer to becoming law.
I joined MS Now to discuss releasing the video of the second boat strike.
Reposted byRep. Adam Smith
Rep. Smith: They have released 15-20 different strike videos. Release the video of the strike. There is nothing classified about the roughly 30 seconds where you see the two people on the boat before the strike hits. He is flat out lying to say that that is classified information.
Speaker Mike Johnson and Republicans could have addressed this ongoing health crisis months ago. Instead, they chose to wait for the last minute.
This administration is failing to meet their fundamental moral and legal obligation to NWIPC's detainees, violating their dignity. No one in our state should live under these conditions.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.