By shifting to short-term shelters, these Trump-backed policies would threaten the housing stability of about 170,000 people nationwide and risk up to $120 million annually for Washington state.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 9
Adam Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam Smith
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 9
SoupScore
Adam's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 97 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We need full transparency on expiring grants, staffing capacity, and obligation dates to prevent service interruptions and ensure continued support for the individuals who rely on permanent supportive housing.
HUD has released a long-delayed funding notice showing the largest funding gap in a decade, disrupting housing and services for 170,000 vulnerable Americans.
I recently signed on to two letters supporting Continuum of Care funding, which provides essential housing services to hundreds of thousands of people whom the Trump administration’s policies would leave at risk of homelessness.
My request for you is to watch this video so you can hear and fully understand the cadets' love of community and country.
God bless them.
Frank Luntz: The cadets at West Point live a life of commitment, courage, and character every single day. Today, on Thanksgiving, my gratitude goes out to them wherever they are.
x.com/frankluntz/s...
Happy Thanksgiving to all those celebrating across the Ninth District. I’m thankful to serve
your communities and hope you enjoy your day with loved ones.
King County has approved a new budget allocating more than $225 million for public safety and criminal justice, as well as over $55 million for housing and homelessness services. By providing more behavioral health programs and housing transition initiatives, we give our neighbors a better chance .
Seattle residents need to make over $135,00 a year to live a comfortable lifestyle, making our city the 6th most expensive in the nation. We need to bring down everyday costs, including rent, groceries, and energy to combat an unaffordable community.
@simonwdc.bsky.social
There's no such thing as a good totalitarian.
My constituent Sharon is concerned about the cost of housing. We spoke about increasing the supply in the housing market and my stance on Trump's proposed 50-year mortgage during my Virtual Town Hall on Saturday.
REMINDER: I am hosting a Virtual Town Hall today at 12 p.m. Join our discussion to share your thoughts on Congress, our community, and the state of our country. Tune in via livestream on Instagram, Facebook, X, and YouTube or join at adamsmith.house.gov/live. I hope to see you shortly.
The Trump Administration is weakening our health care system by systematically cutting funding and access to care.
I’ve been a longtime supporter of funding these services to grow and diversify our workforce.
Many working-class Washingtonians juggle paying for housing, transportation, education, and on top of that, job training. Supporting workforce development programs allows workers to have the skills they need to obtain high-quality, good-paying careers, without falling into massive debt.
I was proud to join 77 of my colleagues in cosponsoring legislation to commemorate this day and to recognize those who have been unjustly taken from us by hatred and bigotry.
Yesterday marked Transgender Day of Remembrance, a time when we honor all transgender individuals who have suffered due to anti-trans violence.
If you missed my last town hall, join me tomorrow at 12pm PT. You can tune in via livestream on Instagram, X, Facebook, YouTube and Substack, or visit adamsmith.house.gov/live.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.