Republicans in Congress are about to vote to explode the deficit & cut at-home care for seniors, in order to fund tax cuts for people who don't need tax cuts. Their town halls are going to get a lot angrier after that.
youtu.be/T3JI07rL9gs
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 595
Yes44%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 11 sponsored · 89 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Vladimir Putin is running circles around Donald Trump & his JV team.
From October 7th onward, I have insisted that Hamas must have no role in the governance of Gaza. As the terrorists return the bodies of Oded Lifshitz, Shiri Bibas, and Kfir & Ariel Bibas, who were 9 months and 4 years old when taken hostage, we are all reminded of why Hamas is evil.
My conversation with Ezra Klein on building new cities and taxing the daylights out of social media corporations.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tnQ...
Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.
Zelensky must be at the table for negotiations
www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9lp...
Firing FDA scientists doesn't cut waste, fraud & abuse in government.
It makes it easier for bad actors to get away with waste, fraud & abuse in industry. Undermining expert regulators punishes innovators & rewards snake oil salesmen.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8Co...
Giving tax cuts & handouts to the billionaire tech moguls who attended the inauguration is not cutting waste, fraud & abuse, and it's not lowering costs for Americans.
youtu.be/8AwwA1SQ7Eg
But opposition to bad ideas isn't enough. In states where Democrats have a trifecta, we must demonstrate better ideas in governance, particularly on how to lower the cost of housing and healthcare.
Republicans have the trifecta in Washington. Democrats will oppose any unlawful or inflationary actions they take.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_-E...
Your barometer of Trump’s pledge to lower costs should be your auto & home insurance premiums.
youtube.com/shorts/eFKEZ...
The Trump administration is negotiating against itself. Instead, it should strengthen U.S. support for Ukraine while driving hard negotiations with Russia that secure our ally's eastern border, guarantee it freedom of navigation in the Black Sea, and assure its accession to the European Union.
As the nation's top health officer, Secretary Kennedy now has tremendous power over the development and distribution of vaccines. Sitting on the committee with oversight of him, I will be laser-focused on preventing any more of his "natural experiments" on children's immunity.
In 2019, RFK Jr. ran what he called a "natural experiment" in Samoa to prevent measles immunization. The result of his experiment? Children died of measles.
youtube.com/shorts/cSI5i...
But they will care when they hear from their own universities & hospitals. Research executives: call your Republican Member of Congress!
Republicans in Congress certainly do not care that the NIH's cuts to research infrastructure are illegal. And they may not care that the policy is a $2 billion tax on Massachusetts' Eds & Meds enterprise.
youtu.be/b__wJ4IwB5k
But they will care when they hear from their own universities & hospitals. Research executives: call your Republican Member of Congress!
Hundreds of thousands of jobs & billions in Bay State GDP rely upon NIH funding.
youtube.com/shorts/EUFhX...
Just when diseases like Alzheimer's, heart disease, and cancer could be made treatable, we could see our young scientists discouraged, discoveries withering on the vine, and US global leadership in science and technology receding.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History595 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
595 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-21 | H. Con. Res. 58 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.