By firing essential staff, President Trump and Elon Musk are playing politics with our public safety.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Rhode Island District 1
Gabe Amo
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 537
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gabe Amo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratRhode Island District 1
SoupScore
Gabe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 120 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Somewhere in the Kremlin, Vladimir Putin is smiling from ear to ear watching Trump and Vance berate President Zelensky.
It is beyond words to witness a president side with a dictator over an ally who is fighting to preserve our shared ideal of democracy.
It’s saying a lot when America’s weatherman Al Roker is speaking out against Trump & DOGE’s NOAA staff firings. Their actions aren’t just wrong — they’re dangerous and make us less safe when storms hit.
I joined @lauracoates.com to discuss how I’m standing up for nursing homes, long-term care centers, health care affordability, and school lunches for children across the country.
The Republican budget resolution is a clear contrast in values. They’re charging forward on $1.1 trillion in tax cuts for the top 1% and threatening the exact same in potential cuts to Medicaid and programs that feed our kids.
🧵 BREAKING NEWS: the world’s richest man learns that actions have consequences…
It’s a big problem that President Trump can’t remember one of our most important security partnerships with Australia and the UK as
*checks notes*
the UK Prime Minister sits right next to him.
Mass layoffs and Social Security office closures at won’t improve efficiency — they’ll hurt beneficiaries, full stop.
Donald Trump said he wouldn’t touch Social Security — he lied.
🚨Attention federal science employees in #RI01:
Given the Trump administration’s attacks on federal workers and science agencies, the Science, Space, and Technology Committee wants to hear from you!
Share your story through the survey link below ⬇️
democrats-science.house.gov/sciencefirings
Great to meet with NASN! In schools across RI, nurses like Amy are essential in supporting mental health, offering care, compassion, and early intervention.
I'm proud to support efforts that would recognize their work & grow the pipeline of nursing students to schools in our community.
I joined @reed.senate.gov, @whitehouse.senate.gov, and @magaziner.house.gov demanding answers about these drastic cuts.
Trump’s illegal decision to reduce the reimbursement rate for indirect research costs would have a devastating effect on RI research institutions that rely on NIH funding to carry out their life saving work.
$230 billion in potential cuts to SNAP
+ $880 billion in potential cuts to Medicaid
= $1.1 trillion in tax giveaways to the top 1%
We can't — and won't — stay silent while they hurt ordinary Americans to give to the rich.
Because it's the clearest example of how Republicans are looking to gut programs that feed and care for everyday Americans in order to cut taxes for the richest few.
🧵 In the @housebudgetdems.bsky.social committee and on the House floor, my colleagues and I have been using this simple graphic.
Why?
Reposted byCongressman Gabe Amo
After 3 surgeries, a blood clot, infection & being hospitalized for over a week, the moment I was discharged I rushed to the airport so I could get on a plane to DC & vote NO on Republicans’ disastrous budget plan.
Rep. Pettersen traveled from Colorado with her newborn son so she could vote NO. 🧵
Tonight, 217 Republicans voted to betray the needs of ordinary Americans by shoveling over $1 trillion in tax giveaways to the richest 1%.
Instead of working to lower costs, Republicans are charging full steam ahead to abandon their constituents and cut health care and nutrition programs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History537 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
537 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.