The American people deserve to have their representatives play their proper role in our constitutional government, especially involving a decision of such enormous gravity.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1
Suzanne Bonamici
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 537
Yes39%
No59%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 53 sponsored · 262 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The President does not have the authority to enter into war without Congressional approval—it is unconstitutional. To begin a war is among the most consequential decisions a nation can make, affecting its troops, civilians, and the world.
The Department of Labor denied my request to visit the Tongue Point Job Corps campus, but that didn’t stop me from meeting off campus with staff and students to hear their stories. Job Corps saves lives, and I’m going to keep fighting to save Job Corps.
Cutting Medicaid is irresponsible, inhumane, and immoral, and I will fight these cuts with every tool I have. It was an honor to stand with Oregonians to defend our values, hear how devastating Medicaid cuts will be, and commit to improving - not cutting - access to health care.
Reposted bySuzanne Bonamici
I was proud to stand alongside @wyden.senate.gov, @repbonamici.bsky.social, and all of you incredible leaders.
Together, we will continue to shine a light through the darkness and speak out against injustices.
It’s your stories that power this fight.
Reminder: Tomorrow I'm holding a town hall meeting at Seaside High School at 2 pm. Doors will open at 1 pm. Please do not bring large bags or backpacks to the event.
I look forward to hearing your concerns and answering your questions.
Please keep speaking out and participating in democracy. Your voices have the power to affect change in Oregon and the country.
Thanks to all the Oregonians who attended my June town hall meeting in Hillsboro. I heard many concerns about the Trump administration’s threats to civil rights and liberties and discussed what I’m doing to stop the GOP’s Big Bad Bill, which includes devastating cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.
On this day, we celebrate the liberation of enslaved African Americans and reflect on past and present racial injustice as we thrive to build a more just future together.
Although President Abraham Lincoln’s 1863 Emancipation Proclamation should have ended slavery, African Americans in Texas remained enslaved for another two years until June 19th, 1865, when they were finally freed.
Your stories matter because they show how the Trump administration’s plan to close Job Corps will harm real Oregonians and Americans. Please continue speaking up about what Job Corps means to the students and communities it serves. I’m going to do the same.
Yesterday a federal judge in New York heard arguments in a case challenging the Trump administration’s attempt to shut down the Job Corps program. The judge extended his order to pause the closure to next Wednesday, which means Job Corps is safe—for the next week.
![Graphic with excerpt from a Bloomberg Law article. Title: Judge Extends Temporary Freeze on Trump’s Job Corps Wind Down. Subtitle: A New York-based federal judge extended until next Wednesday his order temporarily blocking the US Department of Labor from shutting down its Job Corps training program for low-income young adults. By Beth Wang and Rebecca Rainey. At least one named plaintiff was homeless before joining the program, but the government argued individual program participants don’t have standing to sue because they’re not parties to the center contracts. [Trump Justice Department attorney Jean-David Barnea] said that the named plaintiff and other participants would be sent back to their previous residence of record when the centers cease operations. “I know some are homeless, but even they had a residence of record” when they applied, he said.
“It seems like more than a minor upheaval,” [Judge Andrew L. Carter] said. “If she is being removed from her residence and sent back to a homeless shelter, why is that not an injury that establishes standing?”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3A74zycyzzi7wg26nudctnc55p/bafkreihjbuh4zopowlmwdhhbuwqznkl7uxrqjtkehk2fuh43eq245mpo2m@jpeg)
Scapegoating or demonizing people because of who they are or who they love is wrong, and it’s inhumane. I will always fight for LGBTQI+ Oregonians.
This Pride Month comes at a difficult time for the LGBTQI+ community, but I’m optimistic because Oregonians are committed to protecting access to lifesaving care and civil rights for everyone.
Thank you to the local leaders who got together with me to discuss the Trump administration and GOP threats to gender-affirming care.
Oregonians: this Supreme Court ruling does not change Oregon law, which continues to provide the strongest protections for gender-affirming care in our country.
Judges and politicians should not dictate deeply personal medical decisions that are best made by patients, their trusted family, and health care providers.
Gender-affirming care is lifesaving care. This ruling by a conservative SCOTUS majority is inhumane and it goes against the leading standard of care for trans youth.
I’m holding a town hall meeting today, June 17, in Hillsboro. Doors open at 5 and the meeting begins at 6. Please do not bring large bags or backpacks.
I look forward to hearing your ideas and questions.
For those who have found their path to success through Job Corps and others who will need that path in the future, let’s tell the Labor Department that we care about every student, and let’s save Job Corps.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History537 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
537 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.