Suzanne Bonamici headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 1
Born
October 14, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-0855
Office
2231 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1

Suzanne Bonamici

Suzanne Marie Bonamici is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative for Oregon's 1st congressional district, a seat she was first elected to in a 2012 special election. The district includes most of Portland west of the Willamette River, along with most of Portland's western suburbs such as Beaverton, Hillsboro, Tigard, and Lake Oswego.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 553
Yes39%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Suzanne Bonamici headshot
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 56 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reliable water infrastructure is critical to the wellbeing of communities. I’m grateful that Washington County will receive the funding I advocated for to update and upgrade water systems, help the systems withstand an earthquake, and support daily life. bonamici.house.gov/media/press-...
Reposted bySuzanne Bonamici
Giving families a safe, comfortable place to stay is key to helping them transition out of homelessness and into permanent housing. That’s why I’m proud to support the Project Turnkey Act, which would take Oregon's successful program nationwide.
As Founder and co-chair of Congressional STEAM Caucus, I appreciate the Museum’s important, community-based work to engage kids, spark curiosity, and support a well-rounded education.
Project Turnkey is helping Oregonians experiencing homelessness gain the stability they need to find permanent housing, but housing is still too expensive or unavailable in many communities.
In her focus on homelessness, Gov. Tina Kotek visited a shelter in Astoria that's part of the Turnkey program that converts old hotels/motels into shelters to move people into stable housing. @jmshumway.bsky.social reports oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2024/12/09/o...
Acting Labor Sec. Su is a steadfast advocate for workers, and I was honored to show her some of the innovative partnerships between unions, employers, schools, and local governments in Oregon when she visited earlier this year.
Graphic based on Spotify Wrapped format with picture of Congresswoman Bonamici and Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su. Text reads, "My Top Visit: Acting Labor Sec. Julie Su." Below, "Stolen Wages Recovered Under the Biden-Harris administration: $1 billion+."
It is shameful that Trump’s billionaire friends are proposing budget cuts that would hurt veterans and children, especially when his previous administration added trillions to the national debt by giving tax cuts to the wealthy. But these proposed cuts are just that—proposals.
Musk and Ramaswamy have already identified $516B dollars in government savings — it includes cutting all of Veteran’s Affairs health care, eliminating the NIH, and ending funding for federal prisons. @morningjoe-msnbc.bsky.social
Nurses are an essential part of our healthcare system. Some of my Oregon colleagues joined me in urging leaders at the Oregon Nurses Association and Providence to come to the table in good faith and negotiate a fair contract.
Image of a letter sent to ONA and Providence. 

Dear Ms. Tan Piazza and Mr. Hochman,
We write today to express our fervent hope that Providence and the Oregon Nurses Association (ONA) will come together in good faith and expeditiously negotiate - around the clock if necessary - for new employment contracts for the nearly 6,000 doctors, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and clinical staff in the Providence system across the state of Oregon. These dedicated doctors, nurses, and clinical staff have taken the extraordinary step to authorize strikes in Portland, Medford, Hood River, Seaside, Milwaukie, Oregon City, Newberg, and beyond. Without a prompt resolution we risk a significant disruption to the health care system in Oregon. These skilled clinicians seek competitive wages and benefits and adequate staffing levels so they can provide the quality patient care that Oregonians deserve and expect. The last few years have not been easy for anyone in health care, and the health care system continues to face a variety of challenges. Providence nurses, doctors, and clinical staff provide needed and often life-saving care to many vulnerable patients and a strike of this scale would significantly interrupt access to, and continuity of, care. Nurses and clinical staff are on the frontlines of health care and are essential in every part of the system, including in the care and experience of each patient and their family or loved ones. They know each patient’s needs and have a vital perspective on safe staffing and quality care. Hospital administrators have an acute awareness of the challenges of running a health care facility and
system.
Second page of letter. 

We appreciate that Providence and ONA both share the goal of providing excellent patient care and experiences. We remain hopeful that this shared goal can lead to a timely resolution of contract negotiations; a resolution that fosters a renewed spirit of collaboration and partnership between Providence and the nurses and clinical staff represented by the Oregon Nurses Association. As representatives of Oregon in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, we often speak of the Oregon way. The Oregon way upholds innovation and collaboration and brings people together to solve problems, despite differences. It is creative, respectful, and full of promise. We urge you to swiftly bring the spirit of the Oregon way to your negotiations. On behalf of the millions of Oregonians we represent, it is our sincere hope that ONA and Providence negotiate contracts in good faith as quickly and amiably as possible. Thank you for your attention to this important matter and for your consideration of our request.

Sincerely, 

Suzanne Bonamici, Member of Congress; Val Hoyle, Member of Congress; Andrea Salinas, Member of Congress; Earl Blumenauer, Member of Congress; Jeffrey A. Merkley, United States Senator; Ron Wyden, United States Senator.
NW Oregon and the rest of our state received significant federal investments this year to help rebuild crumbling infrastructure, clean up pollution, and advance environmental justice.
A graphic using the Spotify Wrapped format with a picture of Congresswoman Bonamici and list of top projects that were funded in 2024. 

List: $2.1B for the Interstate Bridge Replacement; $450M for reconnecting the Lower Albina neighborhood; $197M for reducing climate pollution; $20M for clean school buses in Beaverton; and $1M for rehabilitating Pier 2 in Astoria. 

Community Project Funding for NW Oregon: $16.8 million.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
553 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 12Next →