Donald S. Beyer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Virginia District 8
Born
June 20, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 225-4376
Office
1226 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Virginia District 8

Donald S. Beyer, Jr.

Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. is an American politician, businessman, and diplomat serving as the U.S. representative for Virginia's 8th congressional district since 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, his district is located in Northern Virginia and includes Alexandria, Falls Church, Arlington, and parts of eastern Fairfax County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 553
Yes41%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Donald S. Beyer headshot
Donald S. Beyer, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVirginia District 8
SoupScore
Donald S.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 47 sponsored · 174 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans know their bill is bad and will harm millions of Americans by kicking them off their health care, and gutting their food assistance. We just need 4 of my Republicans colleagues to care enough about the American people to kill this horrific bill.
SNAP helps 42 million Americans at or below the poverty line afford groceries every month, but under Trump’s One Big Ugly Bill this food assistance risks being taken away or reduced. Children would go hungry to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. It’s dangerous and immoral.
This Big Ugly Bill multiplies ICE's budget by over 20 times, giving ICE about as much money as the Marine Corps to supercharge their rogue, authoritarian MAGA police state tactics at an unprecedented scale.   It's heinous and I will be voting against it.
Donald Trump’s One Big Ugly Bill would be a disaster for American health care. People will get sicker, people will go into medical debt, and people will die. I will be voting NO.
Senate Republicans just passed the Big Ugly Bill, which contains - Massive tax cuts for billionaires - Tax hikes for working Americans - 17 million lose health care - The biggest cuts to Medicaid and SNAP ever - Higher energy costs - Trillions in debt It comes to the House now. We will fight this.
"Tax cuts in House Republicans’ megabill would lead to increased assets for the richest Americans, while reducing them for the lowest-income households through cuts to federal spending on Medicaid and food aid." www.politico.com/news/2025/05...
Donald Trump promised to make it easier, not harder, for parents to afford the basics, but his tariffs are making life much more expensive for American families. New parents are now paying 24% more for essentials like strollers, cribs, and car seats.
This is yet another act of extreme authoritarian overreach on behalf of the Trump Administration. It’s unacceptable. Our colleges and universities must remain spaces for free thought, not be political pawns to advance Trump’s agenda.
Breaking News: The University of Virginia president, James E. Ryan, is said to have resigned under pressure from the Trump administration over DEI. nyti.ms/4npkLUK
Text reads: "University of Virginia President Resigns Under Pressure From Trump." Photo of James E. Ryan by Win Mcnamee/Getty Images
Today’s SCOTUS ruling is a dangerous step toward dismantling judicial checks on Trump’s dangerous authoritarianism, and it opens the door for him to revive his unlawful attack on birthright citizenship.
Breaking News: The Supreme Court limited the use of nationwide injunctions and said President Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship can go partially into effect in 30 days.
America’s diplomatic corps is needed now more than ever. 59 of my colleagues joined me in urging Secretary Rubio to halt FSO firings and resume the administration of FSOTs.
This relocation comes at a time when, at President Trump’s direction, NSF is reeling from mass firings of staff and clumsy grant cancellations and freezes that harm our national interests. Harming NSF’s work will directly harm people across this country. 5/
I agree that HUD employees need a facility that provides a safe environment and reflects the value of their service. As a proud Alexandrian, I'm happy to welcome federal agencies into our community, but this proposed move raises serious concerns about the future of NSF. 4/
NSF is a crown jewel of our government, driving innovation and scientific breakthroughs that are essential to America’s economy, security, and global leadership. Its public servants deserve a safe, well-maintained workplace that allows them to effectively serve the public. 3/
I will continue to do all I can to protect NSF’s legacy of scientific advancement, support its incredible staff, and ensure they have the resources they need with a minimum of disruption. That means its headquarters must remain in our community, where it belongs. 2/
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
553 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 12Next →