The Congress must demand that the President seek our Constitutionally required approval if he intends to engage in a protracted conflict. (4/6)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Washington
Maria Cantwell
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 843
Yes31%
No69%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Maria Cantwell
U.S. SenatorDemocratWashington
SoupScore
Maria's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
... and rebuilding the international coalition of allies and partners forged to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by having a vigorous inspection regime like the one under the 2015 the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). (3/6)
The Iranian government is by every definition an enemy of the United States, but the enduring solution is to leverage strong bipartisan support for tougher sanctions ... (2/6)
President Trump has no authority to make an end run around the Constitution. (2/2)
President Trump can’t seize control of or interfere in our elections. The Constitution is absolutely clear: states administer our elections, which is why the courts blocked Trump’s earlier executive order banning mail-in voting and demanding citizens’ data. (1/2)
Reposted bySen. Maria Cantwell
Watch @cantwell.senate.gov cut to the chase on ROTOR Act & tell Speaker Johnson to bring it back to the floor. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmzp...
Plus, he’s pushing Congress to pass the SAVE America Act which will also cost Americans: time, money, and even their constitutional right to vote. (3/3)
He also made more baseless claims about our voting system. The President is threatening to nationalize our elections – power he doesn’t have under our Constitution. (2/3)
Americans who were eager to hear President Trump’s plan to fight higher health care costs, higher food costs, and higher housing costs didn’t hear one. His speech left many Americans wondering how his vision of a new Gilded Age economy applies to them. (1/3)
The SAVE America Act passed by the House of Representatives and under consideration by the Senate will cost Washingtonians time, money, and maybe even their vote.
We need to fight back.
www.columbian.com/news/2026/fe...
The President made products more expensive for the American people. People are going to tell their senators, we don't like this. So it's time for my Senate colleagues to weigh in on this debate.
This Administration illegally collected hundreds of billions of dollars from American businesses. I’m requesting detailed information about how the Administration plans to reimburse the payors of those tariffs. My letter to Sec. Bessent ⬇️
![Dear Secretary Bessent:
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing certain tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) must prioritize prompt reimbursement to those businesses that have paid the substantial tariffs.
Given this Administration has illegally collected hundreds of billions of dollars from American businesses, that now must be refunded, I am requesting detailed information about how the Administration plans to fairly and expeditiously reimburse the payors of those tariffs.
The Administration should have been preparing for months for the potential that the Supreme Court would likely agree with the position taken by lower courts – including the Court of International Trade, district courts, and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – that the president exceeded his legal authority under IEEPA.[1] Many American businesses, especially small and medium-sized businesses, have struggled to pay these illegal tariffs and, for some, the financial strain has placed them on the brink of bankruptcy. Thus, it is essential Treasury implement an expeditious and transparent process to remediate the financial harm that resulted from these illegal tariffs.
As I understand it, when a good enters a U.S. port of entry, merchandise is classified and tariffs are assessed using the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Importers self-classify and declare the value or quantity of their goods and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reviews the paperwork, collects any applicable tariffs, and deposits any revenue from tariffs or other penalties into the General Fund of the United States.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3Ae3ap6sjaftiof33z6xjt54aa/bafkreicr5mgcygdru4qq2xfpu7hzvarhitw4utremfqjhicm7u3ggfds3m@jpeg)
![The Monthly Treasury Statement provides only an aggregate line item for “customs duties,” but we must have more detailed information to see precisely which firms, particularly small businesses, are shouldering the frontline cash burden of these tariff taxes. Therefore, we ask that you provide data regarding the revenues from IEEPA tariffs.
Specifically, please provide the following breakdown of the customs duties collected for the year 2024 and 2025:
Revenues collected on imports by country of origin.
Revenues collected for each Section of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
Revenues collected by the geographic location or state of the U.S. importers liable for payment of the duties.
The name and specific amount of revenue collected from each of the top 500 U.S. importers responsible for the highest level of duty payments
Further, Congress must also have detailed information in order to enable proper oversight and inform possible legislative action with respect to the fiscal fallout of remediating these illegal tariffs.
As you know, many companies now are pursuing refund claims through litigation.[2] Refunds, however, must not be limited to those businesses that chose to litigate or can afford to initiate litigation to seek the relief they are entitled to in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling. All businesses must have substantial clarity that the Administration will move forward with a timely, transparent, and equitable process for refunding money to which the government is not legally entitled.
Therefore, I request a detailed explanation of the Department of Treasury’s plans to process tariff refunds and the anticipated timeline for implementation. If there are no such plans in place, I urge the Department of Treasury to begin planning immediately for a tariff refund process that takes into account the following key considerations:
Procedures that are transparent;
Applicability to all affected parties, regardless of the status or disposition in the liquidation pr…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3Ae3ap6sjaftiof33z6xjt54aa/bafkreiaws4722w5vwb3tkrsk5yqg2nu65lbk65d653f3i3ntpxrxmb5siq@jpeg)
We need to really be concerned about America's competitiveness and thank God the court has given us some relief. (2/2)
Today's decision is so important because consumers all over our state and the country have been hurt. Small businesses, manufacturers, individual households have all had to pay higher prices on products that they can't afford. (1/2)
Today is the Day of Remembrance for Japanese internment, a day to remember that Japanese Americans were stripped of their freedom for no other reason than their heritage. We must continue to learn from this dark chapter in American history.
Childcare is a crisis in America, and we know parents need better options.
Today in Spokane, I stood with parents, childcare providers, and local leaders to announce a new affordable childcare facility. By lowering these costs, we're easing the burden on families.
Our hearts and prayers are with the Jackson family and the millions of supporters who understand the importance of the work he carried out both nationally and internationally most of his adult life. (2/2)
Jesse Jackson was a warrior, poet, and icon for civil rights and economic justice for more than 60 years. (1/2)
I congratulate the three Republican House members who stood up for Congress’ constitutional power. Now, I hope the rest of their conference will join a united Democratic caucus in a strong vote to reject the broad tariffs that are raising costs on American families.
www.politico.com/live-updates...
To further protect consumers’ pocketbooks, Congress should pass the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act that will make PBMs’ spread pricing and claw backs permanently unlawful. (3/3)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History843 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
843 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 138 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 32 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 123 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2026-04-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-26 | S. 1383 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 103 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 107 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S.J. Res. 116 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S. 1383 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | S. 1383 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2026-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2026-03-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2026-03-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2026-03-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37) |
| 2026-03-21 | S. 1383 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-21 | S. 1383 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-20 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-18 | S.J. Res. 118 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 1383 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2026-03-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2026-03-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2026-03-12 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-12 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (89-10) |
| 2026-03-11 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-11 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (84-10) |
| 2026-03-10 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-29) |
| 2026-03-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-28) |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-04 | S.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2026-03-02 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (57-33) |
| 2026-02-26 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-34) |
| 2026-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-02-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-02-12 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-47) |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-02-10 | S.J. Res. 95 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.