
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Tennessee District 9
Steve Cohen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 518
Yes40%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Steve Cohen
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTennessee District 9
SoupScore
Steve's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 53 sponsored · 297 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Did you know that the law regulating how the federal government collects and uses our personal data is 51 years old?
On today's Digital Download, I talked about how @housedemocrats.bsky.social are fighting back against Elon Musk accessing Americans' most sensitive personal data.
www.instagram.com/reel/DHb1yCX...
@housedemocrats response to the illegal Trump “executive order” ending the department of education. Reminds me of the line in a song “we don’t need no education.”.@RepjoeNeguse
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Impressive turnout in Memphis tonight for @repcohen.bsky.social town hall. Too bad @marshablackburn.bsky.social and @billhagerty.bsky.social don’t care about their constituents on this side of the state (or at all) enough to do the same!
We had a great Townhall with over 750 people who were very concerned about democracy, the illegal accent Musk and Trump. Also very concerned about Social Security and Medicaid and Medicare .
Max your being there to reassure them was so important. Thank you.
He appeared to be a nice guy when you bought your car and when most thought he was pro environment. Well we know better. He doesn’t care about people or fair, oversight of his businesses. And we know there are lots of good cars out there.
CEO of committee to preserve social security and Medicare Max Richtman is our special guest at town hall tomorrow night.
Taking the “law” into their own hands is treasonous. The executive team doesn’t believe they are bound by the Constitution
Bomb not Bob
I suspect even Maga people like dogs and particularly Bob sniffing dogs. Trump doesn’t like dogs, but this is nuts or at best “not normal.”
They are 100% MAGA
Trump and Musk are destroying the government which is the structure of the United States of America. We have an authoritarian as president and this is scary as Hell.And the Republicans in Congress don’t care.It’s not my country. It may be Trumpsylvania or Muskrat but it’s not the USA.
I will fight!
I served a term on conservation and natural resources committee where the chair was Rep.Grijalva. He was fair and courteous to all, but he always stood for the environment.He believed that we inherit the Earth and that we must leave it in a better state for the next generation.He did that. Farewell
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Imagine you're a Republican.
You control the House, Senate & White House.
You spent 9 weeks sucking up to Elon Musk and gutting vital programs. Your "mandate," you said.
You draft a budget alone, without Democrats. Everyone hates it. Your own party can't pass it.
And now it's Democrats' fault? 🤡
Imagine you're a Republican.
You control the House, Senate & White House.
You spent 9 weeks sucking up to Elon Musk and gutting vital programs. Your "mandate," you said.
You draft a budget alone, without Democrats. Everyone hates it. Your own party can't pass it.
And now it's Democrats' fault? 🤡
And what does health guru and HHS Secretary Bobby Kennedy think about this? Will cutting bike lanes and pedestrian infrastructure help combat obesity or “make America healthy again”? Absolutely not.
The GOP thinks our streets are safe enough. No need for improvement.
Now they’re yanking funds for pedestrian safety, biking & EV projects—funding Congress already allocated.
Memphis has the highest pedestrian death rate in the US. We need safer streets, not reckless cuts that make roads deadlier.
The Democratic Caucus and I are prepared to pass a 4-week funding extension that stops harmful cuts, keeps the government open, and gives time to reach a bipartisan deal.
We're ready to vote at any time. We just need Republicans to get serious.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History518 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
518 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11