I fought for a seat on the Appropriations Committee to ensure #WA03's interests are represented in some of the most important decisions before Congress.
I recently voted yes on a defense funding bill that extends strong support for our Armed Forces and gives our servicemembers a 3.8% pay raise.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 3
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes60%
No38%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align79%
Cross-party21%
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 3
SoupScore
Marie Gluesenkamp's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
One that levels the playing field and provides real, durable economic prosperity – not one that saddles our kids with $4 TRILLION in debt to pay for $118,000 yearly tax giveaways for the top 0.1%.
It's why I voted no.
Hardworking families deserved a reconciliation bill that provides middle class tax cuts, protects Medicaid for working U.S. citizens, and prevents costs from rising even more. ⬇️
I refuse to defend bureaucratic inefficiency – which is why I voted against a funding bill in committee that defunds our federal auditing watchdog by half.
We to be aggressively rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse – not kneecapping the Government Accountability Office that investigates it.
Across America, 17 million Americans stand to lose healthcare.
That's more than double the population of our state.
These cuts WILL affect working citizens, seniors, and people with disabilities who are left in the dust with new burdensome red tape and paperwork requirements.
It’s why I voted no.
I live in unincorporated Skamania Co. – so I know how difficult it can be to access care when you need it.
Rural hospitals are a lifeline, and when they suffer, the health of our rural communities suffer.
This bill is a mess of party favors for special interests, while we're left holding the bag.
Wishing everyone a happy Fourth of July weekend with family and friends!
Hope you have some good food and celebrate our freedoms and independence in a way that’s safe for our woods! 🇺🇸
This is what happens when balance and bipartisanship suffer at the hands of single-party control in D.C. – so I voted no.
Under the budget reconciliation bill, everyday families will come out in the negative, while Wall Street reaps the real benefits.
Its soaring national debt increase will worsen inflation and interest rates – and drive up costs on energy, food, and healthcare.
This budget reconciliation bill undermines the economic power of hardworking families – all to give a boost to the well-to-do.
Plus, it's one of the largest explosions of our deficit EVER from a single bill.
Southwest Washington deserved a better deal – so I voted no.
$4 trillion might just seem like another number on paper to politicians in D.C. – but if distributed, it would be $31,000 for every U.S. household.
That’s a massive explosion to our debt.
Families in Southwest Washington know it – and I do too.
It’s why I voted no.
I just voted NO on a bloated, partisan reconciliation bill.
Here's my full statement:
There’s no ethics standard to address Members of Congress remaining in office with memory loss or cognitive decline – and I want to change that.
It’s about transparency, accountability, and Congress holding itself to a higher standard.
There’s a disturbing lack of guidelines to address significant, irreversible cognitive decline in Congress.
I'm joining @cnn.com now to discuss my efforts to set ethics standards on mental acuity – because you deserve to know Representatives are making decisions themselves, not hiding behind staff.
I consider it a privilege that so many communities of all sizes and types have opened their doors to me and shared candidly what their priorities are.
At the Rainier Senior Center, I heard concerns about Medicaid cuts and shared how my team can assist with veterans and Social Security benefits.
As this bill returns to the House, I encourage my Republican colleagues to return to the drawing board and reflect on how this reckless proposal might harm their own constituents.
There was bipartisan opposition to this bill, but it was jammed through the Senate with a tie-breaking vote and budget gimmicks that hide the real cost of the bill.
Still, the Majority has shown no appetite for bipartisanship, despite the Blue Dogs offering to help reach a more balanced outcome. ⬇️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.