Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Voting Record — 593
Yes76%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

1. This is why every city needs a congestion charge and the biggest need per-mile road pricing, ASAP 2. This isn’t materially worse than passenger loading for normal taxis 3. The portion of the vehicle’s life it is in use for passenger service is far, far higher than for a private car
New research examines Waymo's California robotaxi trips btw Aug 2023 and Dec 2025. Conclusion: 46% of miles driven involved no one inside the car. That's 40 million miles of deadheading, with Waymo vehicles using road space w/o transporting a human. doi.org/10.32866/001...
Anyway I bring this up because I think if you’re curious about it, Judge Dredd Megazine (the monthly sister title) from issue 490 and 2000AD from issue 2483 might be worth looking at
And the great reveal of trifecta - the thing you can never have if you weren’t reading it weekly - was the week when the cliffhanger of the Dredd episode directly led into the opening scene of the next serial in the comic. Whose cliffhanger directly led into the NEXT serial.
At the time Trifecta was being serialised, two of the other stories in the magazine were also in the dredd universe, focused on different characters and by different writer/artist teams
One of the single greatest comic book experiences ever was reading the Judge Dredd serial “Trifecta” in the weekly 2000AD magazine. (For those who don’t know it, 2000AD is an anthology title: the first story each week is always judge dredd but the other four vary)
Hm. This seems to play poorly with factionalism. I may support Alice but if I think Bob will put me in cabinet I’m not going to sign anyone’s papers but his
My modest proposal remains that politicians can use WhatsApp but MUST set messages to be deleted within 24 hours. Fine to have a remote version of “meetings in the hallway” but you should need to take things to email if you want to be able to refer back to them.
A possibly unpopular opinion: I think this Mandelson message dump is an awful precedent. A lot of people are just going to set messages to delete now.
It would be moral cowardice to throw a minority under the bus just because it’s currently unpopular to defend them, of course, but that’s not even what happened! The legal status quo shifted and Labour just… folded
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
593 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 12Next →