We should be supporting our service members and military families who sacrifice so much for us – not restricting health care access and undermining our military readiness, retention, and recruitment. That’s why I voted against this year’s NDAA.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 51
Sara Jacobs
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 567
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 51
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sara Jacobs
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 51
SoupScore
Sara's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Another day, another episode of Veep
But we won’t give up this fight. We will continue working to expand all reproductive care options for our military families who’ve sacrificed so much for us and who’ve earned the right to build their families.
That’s why we fought so hard for TRICARE coverage of IVF and other assisted reproductive technology for our service members and their spouses. This would have been life-changing for so many people – and would have gone a long way to address recruitment and retention challenges.
Next year, Members of Congress and federal staff will get IVF coverage as part of their health care – denying that same standard to our service members is beyond hypocritical and proves that we’re not operating by the same rules as everyone else.
Our military families have sacrificed so much for us already. They shouldn’t have to choose between serving their country and having a family – or be saddled with the high costs of IVF.
Paying for IVF out-of-pocket can cost tens of thousands of dollars per cycle. Many military families already struggle to afford child care, safe housing, and food on the table – they simply can’t afford IVF on their own.
Our service members often spend their prime reproductive years in dangerous, hazardous conditions or physically separated from their partner. So it’s unsurprising that ⅔ of service members report family-building challenges because of their military service.
For months, I've fought hard alongside @SenDuckworth for IVF coverage for service members in the NDAA.
Against all odds, we passed our bipartisan amendments in the House and Senate. So I’m very disappointed that Speaker Johnson removed it from the final version of the NDAA.
PART 3!!! Come on my behind-the-scenes tour of the Capitol
PART 2!!! Come on my behind-the-scenes tour of the Capitol
PART 1!!! Come on my behind-the-scenes tour of the Capitol
A trans military ban would cost $18 billion to recruit, train, and replace the thousands of fully trained and qualified trans personnel in our ranks. We shouldn’t throw this money (and our values) down the drain.
Families across the country are paying more for child care than rent, mortgages, or college tuition... it's ridiculous.
We need to build a universal child care system so families aren't spending most of their paychecks on this one expense.
I’m so proud of my team’s work to cut through red tape and solve problems for our constituents! Check out some of our recent casework successes here. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
This is a good step – but we need to establish more guardrails for predatory and unregulated data brokers. The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would put checks on all data brokers and help keep our data safe and private.
This shouldn’t come as a surprise #SpotifyWrapped2024
Health care decisions should be between a doctor and their patient – not the government. I urge the Supreme Court to protect trans rights in US v. Skrmetti.
Thank you CFPB! Data brokers routinely collect, track, or sell our personal data to shady characters, police, and governments around the world. This much-needed rule would help protect our privacy and national security.
We need creativity and new ideas to address all the problems our country is facing. That’s why I was glad to join a workshop with the All Girls STEM Society and chat with some students who are getting involved and advocating for the issues they care about.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History567 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
567 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.