I’m devastated by the horrific shooting of two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C. Acts of violence against our servicemembers will not be tolerated.
As we await more information, I’m grateful to our first responders and I’m praying for our Guardsmen and their families.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 37
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 497
Yes38%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 37
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Sydney Kamlager-Dove
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 37
SoupScore
Sydney's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 115 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Don't get it twisted: Republicans are not serious about protecting law enforcement.
Since you won't answer the question, Sec. Noem, let me ask you again: what measures are in place to protect pregnant women in ICE custody?
Trump and Hegseth just announced that they are investigating Senator Kelly because of his reminder to servicemembers about fulfilling their constitutional duties. This is despicable.
Thank you for your service, patriotism, and courage, Senator Kelly. We stand with you.
Trump has been in politics for 10 years and still has no health care plan (or concepts of a plan)
My @oversightdemocrats.house.gov colleagues joined us in LA today for a field hearing on ICE's efforts to terrorize our communities.
I'll keep fighting to expose their cruelty and defend our city.
My constituent, Vicente, has disappeared in DHS custody. If it can happen to Vicente, it could happen to anyone.
We have an obligation to hold this Administration accountable to keep residents, citizens, and folks who are here safe.
This month, my team brought together caseworkers and legal leaders from across LA to discuss how we can best support our constituents as Trump’s attacks on immigrant families continue.
My office will always show up for our immigrant neighbors who make our city stronger!
I’m shocked and horrified by @bloomberg.com Law and @nbcnews.com’s findings.
I’ll be reintroducing the Pregnant Women in Custody Act to ensure that incarcerated pregnant women are given the care they need and treated with dignity.
Since Vicente Ventura Aguilar suffered a medical incident in DHS' custody, my team, Vicente's family, reporters, and lawyers have been unable to locate him.
I'm demanding answers.
I just sent a letter to Kristi Noem, Todd Lyons, and Rodney Scott demanding answers about the wellbeing and whereabouts of my constituent, Vicente Ventura Aguilar, who has been missing for six weeks following his detainment by CBP.
Vicente's family deserves answers.
My constituent, Vicente Ventura Aguilar, has been missing for over a month after being snatched by immigration officials in South Los Angeles.
Yet, CBP and ICE claim he was never in their custody. I’m demanding answers. Please share this—we must find Vicente.
This is despicable. How the hell is a swastika not a “hate symbol??"
The Trump Administration seems to have a Nazi problem.
He called it "seditious," despite himself leading an insurrection on Jan. 6.
Political violence has no place in America. This must be condemned by both sides. (2/2)
Donald Trump just called for Democratic lawmakers to be hanged for reminding our servicemembers that they swore an oath to our county—not a wannabe dictator. (1/2)
On this day, we honor the lives of transgender Americans taken from us far too soon by senseless violence.
Their memories call us to action.
We must continue to fiercely uplift the transgender community and work to end anti-LGBTQ+ hate.
While Trump continues to drive grocery prices up, I’m committed to ensuring every Angeleno has a delicious meal to share with their loved ones this Thanksgiving.
Check out these upcoming turkey drives, community dinners, and food distributions happening across LA.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History497 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
497 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 10 / 10