Sydney Kamlager-Dove headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 37
Born
July 20, 1972
Age 53
Phone
(202) 225-7084
Office
144 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 37

Sydney Kamlager-Dove

Sydney Kai Kamlager-Dove is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 37th congressional district since 2023. A Democrat, she previously served in the California State Senate, representing the 30th district. She has also served in the California State Assembly and as a trustee for the Los Angeles Community College District.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 37

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sydney Kamlager-Dove headshot
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 37
SoupScore
Sydney's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 121 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

$500 million in cuts to global health programs that help healthy newborns and new mothers… because that’s “pro life?” (And, OMB Director Vought—you would know that family planning and reproductive healthcare IMPROVES women’s lives, if you ever spoke to one)
To make permanent Elon Musk's damage to the federal government, House Republicans just passed Trump’s Make America Unsafe Again package to revoke Congressionally authorized funding for the State Dept & USAID. 🧵Here are the programs that protect Americans they voted to cut:
A Senator being treated like a criminal for asking questions about Trump’s disgraceful ICE raids is an attack on every American’s freedom. The FBI are not the president’s secret police. Those responsible must be fired & @padilla.senate.gov questions must be answered.
BREAKING: SENATOR PADILLA HANDCUFFED AND THROWN TO THE GROUND AFTER BEING FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM PRESS CONFERENCE.
$134 million in taxpayer dollars spent on Trump's made-for-TV, illegal, and unnecessary deployments that escalated tensions in Los Angeles.   Yet we've still received ZERO DOLLARS for fire aid. It’s not just shameful, it’s negligent.
BREAKING: The Pentagon said the deployment of National Guard members and Marines to protests over immigration raids in LA will cost $134 million.
Um, duh there’s a difference… January 6th insurrectionists violently attacked the Capitol in an attempt to overturn the will of the American people.   Most Angelenos are peacefully protesting a lawless administration.   Anyone who engages in violent protest should be held accountable—not pardoned.
Speaker Johnson to reporters on the difference in his attitude to violent rioters in LA versus in DC on Jan 6: “Everybody wants me to re-litigate January 6. I’m not going to do that. There's a very clear distinction between the two.” He says LA rioters are “destroying property.”
You're a lawyer, Mike.   If you think we should use a form of punishment from the 1700s on a sitting Governor, please give us the legal analysis.
Q: The president said that if he were Tom Homan he would arrest Gavin Newsom. Do you believe Newsom should face consequences in a legal way? MIKE JOHNSON: Um, that's not my lane. I'm not gonna give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested. But he ought to be tar and feathered.
Trump has created and manufactured violence in Los Angeles to distract from the Republican budget that will strip 16 million Americans of their health care. His threat to arrest @governor.ca.gov isn't just an authoritarian escalation—it's another distraction.
Trump wants a spectacle. He was always going to deploy the National Guard & the Marines, regardless of the situation on the ground. These deployments aren't warranted, aren't legal, & put Americans at risk. This isn't a reality show—it’s a dangerous & reckless escalation. Call off the troops NOW.
Roughly 500 Marines based at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California are being mobilized to respond to the LA protests.
Last week, I spoke with @pressley.house.gov about ICE raids in her district. Little did we know that Trump would bring these chaotic, unlawful raids to LA a few days later. Let’s be clear: Trump is denying immigrant families due process, and this sh*t is not legal.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 11Next →