Giving Putin exactly what he wants while trashing Ukraine isn’t “ending the war.”
This is what a Russia First policy looks like.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 37
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 535
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 37
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 37
SoupScore
Sydney's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 122 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, we reflect on one of the darkest moments in our nation’s history—the internment of 120,000 Japanese Americans during WWII.
On this Day of Remembrance, we must learn from this painful chapter to ensure it never happens again.
Reminder: this sh*t IS illegal.
And he will be stopped.
Democrats are fighting back.
We’re now supporting over 70 lawsuits against the Trump Administration’s illegal acts, and many of his actions have been temporarily blocked by the courts.
Trump cannot usurp the authority of Congress or the courts.
PM Modi’s visit to DC this past week relaunched US-India relations under Trump—but he isn’t the only one with a say in how these ties evolve.
As the new Ranking Member of @houseforeign.bsky.social’s Subcommittee on South & Central Asia, I intend to help deepen this relationship.
Read my op-ed:
My office is off to a great start this year—I'm extremely proud to announce that we've already returned over $1 million to Angelenos through casework!
If you need assistance with a federal agency, call my office at (323) 965-1422 and you might just get some money back!
Musk, Trump, and silent Republicans are betraying the American people.
Every American is less safe because USAID is not out in the field stopping crises before they reach our shores.
Happy Valentine’s Day from our unelected billionaire overlord 🥰🥰
Is all the sh*t Trump and Elon are doing at USAID legal!?
No, it’s not! Watch as I break it all down.
Republicans cry “censorship” yet turn a blind eye when their own president tries to censor outlets like CNN.
Spare me the crocodile tears.
Republicans have the White House, Senate, and the House—but they haven’t brought any substantive legislation to the Floor.
They don’t have a plan—other than saying yes to Donald Trump.
A genuine threat to our national security is now the Director of National Intelligence.
Tulsi Gabbard is a Putin and Assad sympathizer. Now, she's in charge of not only our national secrets, but our entire intelligence infrastructure.
Shame on the Republicans who know better but caved to Trump.
GIF
Welcome to the inaugural episode of “Is this sh*t legal??”
First up: Democrats just blocked Trump and Elon’s attempt to rescind $4 billion in NIH research funding.
So much for Republicans “Making America Healthy Again”—it’s Democrats saving the day.
I know many of us are alarmed by the Trump Administration’s endless barrage of illegal actions.
To learn more about how I’m fighting back, join my Defending Democracy Telephone Town Hall tomorrow at 6PM PT.
@raskin.house.gov @democracyforward.bsky.social
Darren Beattie needs to be fired.
He is a white nationalist with a long history of endorsing antisemitic, misogynistic, and racist views.
It’s a sick joke that Trump appointed him as the State Department’s Undersecretary to represent American values & culture to the world.
Democrats have leverage to fight back against Musk & Trump—Mike Johnson hasn’t been able to accomplish anything substantive without our votes.
We need to be disciplined, unified, and fighting for the American people.
We’re fighting back—tune into @msnbc.com today at 3pm PT to learn how. 💪🏽
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History535 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
535 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.